[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/5] r100: Don't advertise OpenGL ES 1.1

[Kenneth Graunke]

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 5:40:26 PM PDT Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
> 
> EXT_point_parameters is required, but it is not supported by radeon.
> 
> Fixes piglit's egl-create-context-verify-gl-flavor test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
> Cc: mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
>  src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_screen.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_screen.c
> index 79e3889..aeb2d02 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_screen.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_screen.c
> @@ -782,7 +782,11 @@ __DRIconfig **radeonInitScreen2(__DRIscreen *psp)
>     __DRIconfig **configs = NULL;
>  
>     psp->max_gl_compat_version = 13;
> +#if defined(RADEON_R200)
>     psp->max_gl_es1_version = 11;
> +#else
> +   psp->max_gl_es1_version = 10;
> +#endif
>  
>     if (!radeonInitDriver(psp)) {
>         return NULL;
> 

Is there some reason it can't have a stupid no-op implementation of
EXT_point_parameters?  The driver sets min/max point size to 1.0,
which appears to be allowed by ES 1.1 AFAICT...which means any fading
or attenuation between those values would be...1.0.

Or am I missing something?

As for the rest, patches 2-5 are:
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-stable/attachments/20170530/8b7fb527/attachment.sig>