[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] intel/fs: Use a pure vertical stride for large register strides

[Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez]

On Thu, 2017-11-02 at 15:54 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Register strides higher than 4 are uncommon but they can happen.  For
> instance, if you have a 64-bit extract_u8 operation, we turn that
> into
> UB -> UQ MOV with a source stride of 8.  Our previous calculation
> would
> try to generate a stride of <32;8,8>:ub which is invalid because the
> maximum horizontal stride is 4.  To solve this problem, we instead
> use a
> stride of <8;1,0>.  As noted in the comment, this does not work as a
> destination but that's ok as very few things actually generate that
> stride.
> 

Great!

> Cc: mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
>  src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_generator.cpp | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_generator.cpp
> b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_generator.cpp
> index 46f9a33..a557f80 100644
> --- a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_generator.cpp
> +++ b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_generator.cpp
> @@ -90,9 +90,18 @@ brw_reg_from_fs_reg(const struct gen_device_info
> *devinfo, fs_inst *inst,
>            *       different execution size when the number of
> components
>            *       written to each destination GRF is not the same.
>            */
> -         const unsigned width = MIN2(reg_width, phys_width);
> -         brw_reg = brw_vecn_reg(width, brw_file_from_reg(reg), reg-
> >nr, 0);
> -         brw_reg = stride(brw_reg, width * reg->stride, width, reg-
> >stride);
> +         if (reg->stride > 4) {
> +            /* For registers with an exceptionally large stride, we
> use a
> +             * width of 1 and only use the vertical stride.  This
> only works
> +             * for sources since destinations require hstride == 1.
> +             */
> +            brw_reg = brw_vec1_reg(brw_file_from_reg(reg), reg->nr,
> 0);
> +            brw_reg = stride(brw_reg, reg->stride, 1, 0);

I think it is a good idea to add an assert like:

   assert(reg != &inst->dst)

in order to avoid applying this to dst.

With or without that change,

Reviewed-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <siglesias at igalia.com>

Sam

> +         } else {
> +            const unsigned width = MIN2(reg_width, phys_width);
> +            brw_reg = brw_vecn_reg(width, brw_file_from_reg(reg),
> reg->nr, 0);
> +            brw_reg = stride(brw_reg, width * reg->stride, width,
> reg->stride);
> +         }
>  
>           if (devinfo->gen == 7 && !devinfo->is_haswell) {
>              /* From the IvyBridge PRM (EU Changes by Processor
> Generation, page 13):
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-stable/attachments/20171106/8b0fcdb5/attachment.sig>