[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/dri: don't expose modifiers in EGL if the driver doesn't implement them

[Juan A. Suarez Romero]

On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 18:09 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 27 September 2017 at 17:28, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 27 September 2017 at 16:00, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > > > Hi Marek,
> > > > 
> > > > On 27 September 2017 at 15:55, Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >     if (dmabuf_ret && dmabuf_ret->val.val_bool) {
> > > > >        uint64_t cap;
> > > > > 
> > > > >        if (drmGetCap(sPriv->fd, DRM_CAP_PRIME, &cap) == 0 &&
> > > > >            (cap & DRM_PRIME_CAP_IMPORT)) {
> > > > >           dri2ImageExtension.createImageFromFds = dri2_from_fds;
> > > > >           dri2ImageExtension.createImageFromDmaBufs = dri2_from_dma_bufs;
> > > > >           dri2ImageExtension.createImageFromDmaBufs2 = dri2_from_dma_bufs2;
> > > > >           dri2ImageExtension.queryDmaBufFormats = dri2_query_dma_buf_formats;
> > > > > -         dri2ImageExtension.queryDmaBufModifiers =
> > > > > -                                    dri2_query_dma_buf_modifiers;
> > > > > +         if (pscreen->query_dmabuf_modifiers) {
> > > > > +            dri2ImageExtension.queryDmaBufModifiers =
> > > > > +                                       dri2_query_dma_buf_modifiers;
> > > > > +         }
> > > > 
> > > > This should also not expose queryDmaBufFormats, since that is also
> > > > part of EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import_modifiers, which is pretty
> > > > useless without modifiers.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > True, it's useless. Suggestion makes the code a bit confusing though.
> > > After all EGL already checks that all the entry points are present
> > > before advertising the extension.
> > > 
> > > Either way, I think we want this in stable, right?
> > 
> > Sorry too late, I pushed it.
> > 
> 
> No need to apologise.
> 
> > I don't know if stable is affected.
> > 
> 
> You're right - code was introduced around commit
> f84bb6a9d91521de6da4c3d1ddd8de456761efaa.
> The latter of which landed in Mesa 17.2.0-devel
> 

Not sure if I'm understanding correctly. Do you mean we don't need this
patch in stable?

	J.A.

> -Emil
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-stable mailing list
> mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable