[Mesa-stable] [PATCH] radeon/vce: move feedback command inside of destroy function
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Fri Apr 6 19:24:24 UTC 2018
(Dropping Leo, since it doesn't affect him. He's already subscribed to
the list.)
On 6 April 2018 at 19:20, Mark Janes <mark.a.janes at intel.com> wrote:
> I agree with you, however our release process still has a gap. We
> (Intel) test commits on master, and file bugs when we find them in i965
> or other components.
>
> If those commits already have a stable tag in the commit message, they
> will be shipped at a later date directly to customers, with no testing.
> There is no way to blacklist broken patches in our Mesa's release
> automation.
>
That's why I mentioned that the process cannot be fully automated ;-)
Let me try to explain slightly differently. Amongst others you want:
a) 24h (ish) buffer (getting closer to 0, as we reach the pre-release
announcement) before landing fix in the stable branch.
We had broken _badly_ a few multiple times, a balance between the two
is essential.
Looking at it from Jenkins POV:
You don't want to test/bisect that master is broken, only to apply
same patch and run Jenkins on the same broken patch.
- when issues to happen for example: fdo#103626 currently there's two
ways to handle it
1) add the commit to bin/.cherry-ignore. latter of which means that
you miss the patch when it's actually fixed up.
See a094314340387ef2463ed8b4ddc9317bc539832b for context.
2) carefully/manually git cherry-pick
Doing this allowed me to add the regression to the tracker, as
otherwise we would have missed it for 18.0.0 ;-)
Yet we could introduce on-hold list to cherry-ignore. It's fairly trivial.
Hope that makes things a bit clearer.
-Emil
More information about the mesa-stable
mailing list