[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] ac/nir: set lod to 0 for ac_image_load_mip

[Samuel Pitoiset]

On 04/26/2018 01:51 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> Is there any reason why we can't just use ac_image_load in such cases?

For nit_texop_txf_ms we need one more coordinate for the sample index, 
if we use ac_image_load we only loads 2 coordinates instead of 4 with 
ac_image_load_mip. Though, I have to admit that I'm a bit confused.

Any thoughts on this?

> 
> On 26.04.2018 13:18, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>> Otherwise we hit an assertion in ac_build_image_opcode()
>> for ac_image_load_mip.
>>
>> v2: - set only for ac_image_load_mip
>>
>> Fixes: 24fb3e6aa16 ("ac/nir: use ac_build_image_opcode for image 
>> intrinsics")
>> Cc: 18.1 <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c 
>> b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
>> index e4ae6ef49ad..fb8e44509e9 100644
>> --- a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
>> +++ b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c
>> @@ -1276,6 +1276,8 @@ static LLVMValueRef build_tex_intrinsic(struct 
>> ac_nir_context *ctx,
>>           args->opcode = args->level_zero ||
>>                      instr->sampler_dim == GLSL_SAMPLER_DIM_MS ?
>>                       ac_image_load : ac_image_load_mip;
>> +        if (args->opcode == ac_image_load_mip && !args->lod)
>> +            args->lod = ctx->ac.i32_0;
>>           args->level_zero = false;
>>           break;
>>       case nir_texop_txs:
>>
> 
>