[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/8] egl: rework input validation order in _eglCreateWindowSurfaceCommon

[Andres Gomez]

Emil, this patch has been stalled in the -stable ML for quite some time
without update.

Unless you say otherwise, I will just ignore it at this point and trust
that you will also Cc -stable in the future, in case you come with
another version.

On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 17:36 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 16:15 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On 26 September 2017 at 18:08, Juan A. Suarez Romero
> > <jasuarez at igalia.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:07 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > > On 5 August 2017 at 00:25, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
> > > > > arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Namely - first the dpy, then the config, followed by the surface/window.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Move the check further down or executing the test below will produce
> > > > > the following error.
> > > > > 
> > > > >    dEQP-EGL.functional.negative_api.create_pbuffer_surface
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >    <Section Name="Test2" Description="EGL_BAD_CONFIG is generated if config is not an EGL frame buffer configuration">
> > > > >       <Text>eglCreateWindowSurface(0x9bfff0f150, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0000000000000000, { EGL_NONE });</Text>
> > > > >       <Text>// 0x0000000000000000 returned</Text>
> > > > >       <Text>// ERROR expected: EGL_BAD_CONFIG, Got: EGL_BAD_NATIVE_WINDOW</Text>
> > > > >    </Section>
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > FTR dEQP has been "fixed" (by removing the test all together) to not
> > > > generate the above error. At the same the Pixman equivalent is still
> > > > buggy, hence the v2 of commit
> > > > df8efd5b74d45e2bfb977a92dcd3db86abd6b143.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Emil, does it mean this patch is superseded? I'm interesting in knowing
> > > the situation as this was tagged to be included in stable release.
> > > 
> > 
> > I'd like to keep this open and eventually merge it.
> > The dEQP patches need 'a bit' of polishing.
> > 
> 
> Sure. I'll skip it for next release. Thanks
> 
> 	J.A.
> 
> > -Emil
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-stable mailing list
> > mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-stable mailing list
> mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable
-- 
Br,

Andres