[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] intel: decoder: unify MI_BB_START field naming

Lionel Landwerlin lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Thu Aug 30 13:58:39 UTC 2018


On 28/08/2018 17:01, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-08-28 02:39:58)
>> Yes, I think so. You asked on another commit too, both are related and
>> this depends on other commits from Jason.
>>
>> Here is a list in order of cherry picking :
>>
>> commit f430a37fa75f534c3a114b0ec546fa14f05f5da1
>> Author: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>> Date:   Tue Aug 14 11:22:12 2018 +0100
>>
>>       intel: decoder: unify MI_BB_START field naming
>>
>> commit 2abd7ae189135eb5a1f530a3a1c9412d3a7e238d
>> Author: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand at intel.com>
>> Date:   Fri Aug 24 15:23:04 2018 -0500
>>
>>       intel/decoder: Clean up field iteration and fix sub-dword fields
>>
>> commit cbd4bc1346f7397242e157bb66099b950a8c5643
>> Author: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand at intel.com>
>> Date:   Fri Aug 24 16:04:03 2018 -0500
>>
>>       intel/batch_decoder: Fix dynamic state printing
>>
>> commit 70de31d0c106f58d6b7e6d5b79b8d90c1c112a3b
>> Author: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand at intel.com>
>> Date:   Fri Aug 24 16:05:08 2018 -0500
>>
>>       intel/batch_decoder: Print blend states properly
>>
>>
>> commit 440a988bd1478bb33dafcbb8575473bc643ae383
>> Author: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>> Date:   Sat Aug 25 18:22:00 2018 +0100
>>
>>       intel: decoder: handle 0 sized structs
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -
>> Lionel
>>
>> On 27/08/2018 22:20, Andres Gomez wrote:
>>> Lionel, should we also include this in the stable queues ?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 11:26 +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
>>>> The batch decoder looks for a field with a particular name to decide
>>>> whether an MI_BB_START leads into a second batch buffer level. Because
>>>> the names are different between Gen7.5/8 and the newer generation we
>>>> fail that test and keep on reading (invalid) instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107544
>>>> ---
>>>>    src/intel/genxml/gen75.xml         | 6 +++---
>>>>    src/intel/genxml/gen8.xml          | 6 +++---
>>>>    src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c | 2 +-
>>>>    3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/intel/genxml/gen75.xml b/src/intel/genxml/gen75.xml
>>>> index 5b01fd45400..dfc3d891498 100644
>>>> --- a/src/intel/genxml/gen75.xml
>>>> +++ b/src/intel/genxml/gen75.xml
>>>> @@ -2314,9 +2314,9 @@
>>>>      <instruction name="MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START" bias="2" length="2">
>>>>        <field name="Command Type" start="29" end="31" type="uint" default="0"/>
>>>>        <field name="MI Command Opcode" start="23" end="28" type="uint" default="49"/>
>>>> -    <field name="2nd Level Batch Buffer" start="22" end="22" type="uint">
>>>> -      <value name="1st level batch" value="0"/>
>>>> -      <value name="2nd level batch" value="1"/>
>>>> +    <field name="Second Level Batch Buffer" start="22" end="22" type="uint">
>>>> +      <value name="First level batch" value="0"/>
>>>> +      <value name="Second level batch" value="1"/>
>>>>        </field>
>>>>        <field name="Add Offset Enable" start="16" end="16" type="bool"/>
>>>>        <field name="Predication Enable" start="15" end="15" type="bool"/>
>>>> diff --git a/src/intel/genxml/gen8.xml b/src/intel/genxml/gen8.xml
>>>> index 4ed41d15612..330366b7ed0 100644
>>>> --- a/src/intel/genxml/gen8.xml
>>>> +++ b/src/intel/genxml/gen8.xml
>>>> @@ -2553,9 +2553,9 @@
>>>>      <instruction name="MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START" bias="2" length="3">
>>>>        <field name="Command Type" start="29" end="31" type="uint" default="0"/>
>>>>        <field name="MI Command Opcode" start="23" end="28" type="uint" default="49"/>
>>>> -    <field name="2nd Level Batch Buffer" start="22" end="22" type="uint">
>>>> -      <value name="1st level batch" value="0"/>
>>>> -      <value name="2nd level batch" value="1"/>
>>>> +    <field name="Second Level Batch Buffer" start="22" end="22" type="uint">
>>>> +      <value name="First level batch" value="0"/>
>>>> +      <value name="Second level batch" value="1"/>
>>>>        </field>
>>>>        <field name="Add Offset Enable" start="16" end="16" type="bool"/>
>>>>        <field name="Predication Enable" start="15" end="15" type="bool"/>
>>>> diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c
>>>> index c47a81c8a4d..0f7c8325ea4 100644
>>>> --- a/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c
>>>> +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/anv_batch_chain.c
>>>> @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ emit_batch_buffer_start(struct anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer,
>>>>       anv_batch_emit(&cmd_buffer->batch, GEN8_MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START, bbs) {
>>>>          bbs.DWordLength               = cmd_buffer->device->info.gen < 8 ?
>>>>                                          gen7_length : gen8_length;
>>>> -      bbs._2ndLevelBatchBuffer      = _1stlevelbatch;
>>>> +      bbs.SecondLevelBatchBuffer    = Firstlevelbatch;
>>>>          bbs.AddressSpaceIndicator     = ASI_PPGTT;
>>>>          bbs.BatchBufferStartAddress   = (struct anv_address) { bo, offset };
>>>>       }
> Hi Lionel,
>
> Only patches 1 and 3 of that list apply cleanly to the 18.1 branch, it looks
> like maybe I need a few more patches for things to apply cleanly?
>
> Dylan

Yeah... Looks like this might pull in the world...
Thinking about it again, how much do we need INTEL_DEBUG=batch fixed in 
stable?

-
Lionel


More information about the mesa-stable mailing list