[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/5] add support for EXT_shader_implicit_conversions

[Juan A. Suarez Romero]

On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 14:59 +0100, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> 
> 
> On Nov 6, 2018 13:51, "Juan A. Suarez Romero" <jasuarez at igalia.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 10:32 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: 
> > > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 16:06, Erik Faye-Lund 
> > > <erik.faye-lund at collabora.com> wrote: 
> > > > On Fri, 2018-11-02 at 15:40 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: 
> > > > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 17:11, Erik Faye-Lund 
> > > > > <erik.faye-lund at collabora.com> wrote: 
> > > > > > EXT_shader_implicit_conversions is a useful extension that adds 
> > > > > > implicit 
> > > > > > conversions to OpenGL ES 3.1. Since it's tested excensively in 
> > > > > > dEQP, and 
> > > > > > Mesa already has support for implicit conversions, it seems 
> > > > > > reasonable to 
> > > > > > allow for the extension. This ended up mostly as code-cleanups 
> > > > > > anyway. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > While enabling this, one bug was discorvered due to a failing dEQP 
> > > > > > test 
> > > > > > (see the last patch). 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This makes 2068 dEQP-GLE31 tests go from NotSupported to Pass on 
> > > > > > i965. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > No piglit regressions observed. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Erik Faye-Lund (5): 
> > > > > >   glsl: add has_implicit_conversions()-helper 
> > > > > >   glsl: add has_implicit_uint_to_int_conversion()-helper 
> > > > > >   glsl: fall back to inexact function-match 
> > > > > >   mesa/glsl: add support for EXT_shader_implicit_conversions 
> > > > > >   glsl: do not allow implicit casts of unsized array initializers 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > Erik, I think we'd want the hole series minus the ES extension? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The issues fixed with the final patch affect GLSL 1.30-4.60 at least. 
> > > > > Even if there's no desktop gl tests for it. 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Do you mean for the 18.3 release? If so, yes that might be good. The 
> > > > last patch alone should also fix it, it shouldn't depend on the other 
> > > > patches... 
> > > > 
> > > Technically it should be applicable for earlier series. I'll leave it 
> > > to the guys to decide if we'd want this in 18.2 though. 
> > > 
> > 
> > FWIW, all the 5 patches apply cleanly in 18.2 branch, except the former, which 
> > requires a trivial conflict resolution. 
> > 
> > As I'm not sure if the patches are worth for 18.2, I'll wait to know if you want 
> > them in 18.2 or not. 
> 
> As they only add missing error cases, I doubt they are worth back porting... 
> 

Thanks for the answer. I'll leave them out of 18.2 queue.


> > J.A. 
> > 
> > > -Emil 
> > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > mesa-stable mailing list 
> > > mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org 
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-stable mailing list
> mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable