[Mesa-stable] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] swr/rast: don't create wrapper for every Create LLVM call
Emil Velikov
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 17:28:25 UTC 2019
On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 at 17:58, Dylan Baker <dylan at pnwbakers.com> wrote:
>
> Quoting Hota, Alok (2019-04-04 09:44:40)
> > > > Can you elaborate what seems to be the problem? I'm more than happy to
> > > > rework the patch so it works for you guys - do you have a WIP branch
> > > > somewhere?
> > > >
> > > Humble ping?
> > >
> > > It's been 2 months since I've put this forward. In this time we could have
> > > merged it resolving a massive hack we had for years.
> > > Plus as pointed out I'm happy to help with the future work, but blocking on
> > > that and sitting is rather alienating :-(
> > >
> > > If future work has not landed yet, I would suggest we merge this.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry again for letting this hang and alienating you. I appreciate you pinging this as it had completely dropped off my radar on accident. We did have an internal discussion about this, but it ended vaguely in dissent, though it's not totally clear _why_ some of our collaborators did not like the approach.
> >
> > I think this is worth pursuing, though, so I will bring it up again in our group discussion. Thanks again for providing the patch, and I will let you know if we need your help with this moving forward.
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-stable mailing list
> > mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-stable
>
> I want to mention again that we are very close to being able to drop autotools,
> and this will not be a problem when we do since the tarball wont be
> bootstrapped.
>
Autotools or not the current patch is step in the right direction ;-)
-Emil
More information about the mesa-stable
mailing list