[PATCH v2] Add custom flow control settings for Telit HE910, UE910, UL865
Aleksander Morgado
aleksander at aleksander.es
Thu Mar 12 14:11:12 PDT 2015
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Ben Chan <benchan at chromium.org> wrote:
> Not sure about UE910 / UL865, we probably want to ignore a few
> interfaces on HE910 as these ports aren't responding to AT probe and
> don't want to waste extra time probing them. I can rebase my patch
> earlier to all the following rules. What do you think?
>
>
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="1bc7", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0021",
> ENV{.MM_USBIFNUM}=="02", ENV{ID_MM_PORT_IGNORE}="1"
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="1bc7", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0021",
> ENV{.MM_USBIFNUM}=="04", ENV{ID_MM_PORT_IGNORE}="1"
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="1bc7", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0021",
> ENV{.MM_USBIFNUM}=="08", ENV{ID_MM_PORT_IGNORE}="1"
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="1bc7", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0021",
> ENV{.MM_USBIFNUM}=="0a", ENV{ID_MM_PORT_IGNORE}="1"
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="1bc7", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0021",
> ENV{.MM_USBIFNUM}=="0c", ENV{ID_MM_PORT_IGNORE}="1"
Daniele, what do you think about this? I don't have any of those
modems to check that myself.
If the ports don't reply to AT or anything, then what are those ports
for? (just wondering) I guess one may be a GPS data port, but what
about the others? Also, what's the kernel driver managing those ports?
--
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es
More information about the ModemManager-devel
mailing list