gobi 3000 mc8355 error: couldn't set FCC auth
Bjørn Mork
bjorn at mork.no
Wed Aug 17 18:40:59 UTC 2016
ITwrx Info <info at itwrx.org> writes:
> On 08/17/2016 10:08 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> "ITwrx.org" <info at itwrx.org> writes:
>>
>>> my MM debug log is here: http://pastebin.com/ev8TGi8J
>>
>> OK, so that detects the sw radio off state and runs the FCC auth logic
>> as it is supposed to. But the result indicates this is not the issue:
>>
>> ModemManager[1109]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Received MBIM message
>> ModemManager[1109]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Received message...
>>>>>>>> RAW:
>>>>>>>> length = 20
>>>>>>>> data = 01:13:00:80:02:04:02:01:00:5F:55:07:00:02:04:00:01:00:1A:00
>> ModemManager[1109]: [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Received message (translated)...
>>>>>>>> QMUX:
>>>>>>>> length = 19
>>>>>>>> flags = 0x80
>>>>>>>> service = "dms"
>>>>>>>> client = 4
>>>>>>>> QMI:
>>>>>>>> flags = "response"
>>>>>>>> transaction = 1
>>>>>>>> tlv_length = 7
>>>>>>>> message = "Set FCC Authentication" (0x555F)
>>>>>>>> TLV:
>>>>>>>> type = "Result" (0x02)
>>>>>>>> length = 4
>>>>>>>> value = 01:00:1A:00
>>>>>>>> translated = FAILURE: NoEffect
>> ModemManager[1109]: error: couldn't set FCC auth: QMI protocol error (26): 'NoEffect'
> my reading of the log is that it tried to set the fcc auth but
> failed. to me that doesn't necessarily mean it's not the issue, but i
> don't know. that's just my reading of it from a layman's perspective.
Yes, it failed, but the "NoEffect" is usually pretty descriptive. FWIW,
that's what I get on my EM7455 if I run "Set FCC Authentication" twice:
root at miraculix:/home/bjorn# qmicli -p -d /dev/cdc-wdm0 --device-open-mbim --dms-set-fcc-authentication
[/dev/cdc-wdm0] Successfully set FCC authentication
root at miraculix:/home/bjorn# qmicli -p -d /dev/cdc-wdm0 --device-open-mbim --dms-set-fcc-authentication
error: couldn't set FCC authentication: QMI protocol error (26): 'NoEffect'
So the above indicates that your modem doesn't need "Set FCC
Authentication". There is obviously something keeping it in low-power
mode, but it is more likely something else.
>> Are you sure your modem requires FCC auth?
> no.
>> Are you sure there aren't
>> enywhting else keeping it in radio off state?
> no. there very well may be but i don't know what.
So you haven't seen this e.g. working in Windows?
>> Typically that would a
>> "missing" firmware image, as required by your operator settings.
> this was the only guess i had too. i don't know what firmware i may
> need or where to get it or how to load it. gobi-loader and
> gobi-firmware were the only things i found but they appear to be for
> gobi 2000 and 1000.
Yes. The gobi 3000 didn't normally need any firmware upload since it
came with firmware on flash. But newer modems like the MC73xx and
MC74xx have a concept of firmware image and operator matching, where
they will stay in low-power mode if none of the installed images are
usable.
I don't know if this applies to the gobi 3000 generation, though.
>> Hmm, you don't have any AT command port enabled, do you?
> not that i'm aware of.
>> A look at the
>> "AT!PCINFO?" output would be most useful... Not to mention the
>> "AT!PCFCCAUTH?" I've just learned about.
>>
>> But failing that, could you try this:
> those commands failed to produce any results.
You need to run them on the AT command TTY after entering the OEM
password. I.e.
AT!ENTERCND="A710"
AT!PCINFO?
AT!PCFCCAUTH?
But if you don't have an AT command port, then I guess we would have to
figure out how to enable that first. And I really don't have much
experience with Sierra modems from before the MDM9x00 generation (MC7710
etc). There is a Sierra specific QMI command for setting USB
composition, which might work. But then again, it might not...
>> qmicli -p -d /dev/cdc-wdm0 --device-open-mbim --dms-list-stored-images
> [/dev/cdc-wdm0] Device list of stored images retrieved:
>
> [0] Type: 'modem'
> Maximum: '6'
>
> >>>>>>>>>> [CURRENT] <<<<<<<<<<
> [modem0]
> Unique ID: '8A:6F:98:CD:F2:68:3A:45:97:E0:E8:F2:90:03:1B:F1'
> Build ID: 'D3200-SCAUTNZ-331425XN02'
> Storage index: '0'
> Failure count: '0'
>
Don't know if that got us (or me at least) any further. It looks sane,
but what do I know...
Bjørn
More information about the ModemManager-devel
mailing list