Modem creation/startup order
Colin Helliwell
colin.helliwell at ln-systems.com
Mon Feb 13 13:05:39 UTC 2017
> On 10 February 2017 at 17:47 Aleksander Morgado <aleksander at aleksander.es> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:39 PM, <colin.helliwell at ln-systems.com> wrote:
>
> > I’ve got two ports whitelisted for use by MM. What determines which one of
> > them will be ‘Modem/0’ ?
>
> Just the first modem that finishes first probing all ports.
>
> > Is there a way to get MM to create/initialise 0 first, then 1 – as opposed
> > to doing both in *parallel*?
>
> Nope, no way, they will be done in parallel. Note, though, that you
> can "name" modems or refer to them directly using the physical device
> USB path, which won't change across reboots:
> https://sigquit.wordpress.com/2016/10/06/naming-devices-in-modemmanager/
>
Thanks. The question arises from needing to have monitoring & URCs etc on one port of my mux driver, and ppp on the other - I need to make sure that ppp doesn't get run on the 'monitoring' port i.e. the one that gets in first with having the URCs enabled.
This all makes me think I need this 'primary'/'secondary' port stuff - after all that's more or less what the mux is doing too.
Perhaps I can modify Cinterion's grab_port() to flag the ports as primary/secondary? (They're /dev/ttyMux0, /dev/ttyMux1). Does this sound feasible, or is there more to the dual-portness than that....?
> >
> >
>
> > I’m getting MM to use the Cinterion plugin for my modem, by adding
> >
> > ENV{ID_MM_PLATFORM_DRIVER_PROBE}="1", ENV{ID_VENDOR_ID}="0x1e2d",
> > ENV{ID_MODEL_ID}="0x0001”
> >
> > to the udev rule (the port is a tty); together with mods to the plugin code,
> > to set its MM_PLUGIN_ALLOWED_DRIVERS to the modem’s driver name.
> >
> > However it’s also deciding to also try 3 other plugins (as well as Generic)
> > – Via, Iridium, Nokia. It’s not a major problem because it does try
> > Cinterion first, and decide it’s the best one. But why the other candidates?
>
> The plugin that has a VID:PID list and matches the VID:PID of your
> modem will always be tested first. The additional plugins are plugins
> that support RAW RS232 devices; i.e. plugins where in addition to a
> VID:PID list we also do AT queries to load vendor and product strings,
> and we match against them. Think of a RS232 modem behind a USB
> adapter, there is no VID:PID match possible there, but the plugins
> still query the modem to decide which is the best plugin.
>
> --
> Aleksander
> https://aleksander.es
>
> _______________________________________________
> ModemManager-devel mailing list
> ModemManager-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
More information about the ModemManager-devel
mailing list