MC7455 in X220 with ModemManager 1.6.4

Dominik Strnad litinoveweedle at gmail.com
Wed Jun 7 21:48:50 UTC 2017


Hi Aleksander, thank you for reply.

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Aleksander Morgado <aleksander at aleksander.es
> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> >>
> >> > I did recently change modem in my Lenovo X220 running Ubuntu 16.04 to
> >> > MC7455 I bought from Farnell. I did add Aleksander PPA for
> ModemManager on
> >> > Xenial: https://launchpad.net/~aleksander-m to get newer version on
> MM,
> >> > which should hopefully support my modem. Unfortunately I found that
> bug
> >> > which prevents MM sending FCC auth for MC7455 is still included in
> code in
> >> > MM 1.6.4 release:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager/commit/?id=
> 21f315f6d554b93e4f098cfd0e94c484a8a0c5dc
> >> >
> >> > I tried to backport given fix into MM source package for 1.6.4 on PPA
> >> > but even I did so, I am not able to correctly pass FCC auth ( whole
> MM debug
> >> > is attached). May I please kindly ask Aleksander, would it be possible
> >> > to update your PPA to MM 1.6.6 so I can try my modem with latest MM
> version?
> >> > (maybe there is something else needed to get my modem to work
> correctly)
> >> > Thank you so much.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I don't think FCC auth is your problem, you're getting a "NoEffect"
> error
> >> and that means there is no need to send FCC auth:
> >> ModemManager[2748]: <debug> [1496072816.201321]
> >> [mm-broadband-modem-qmi.c:3024] dms_set_fcc_authentication_ready():
> Couldn't
> >> set FCC authentication: QMI protocol error (26): 'NoEffect'
> >>
> >>
> >> > - I used Sierra flash tool under windows to flash latest FW and
> install
> >> > drivers under Windows7 as I read some reports about images problem
> with card
> >> > but without any efect.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh, you should have used qmi-firmware-update, it works very well ;)
> >
> >
> > Could you please check that I didn't mess fw images anyhow? Is the lsit
> in
> > the MM debug ok? I read about similar problem where it was caused by some
> > disagreement between fw and setting on the card...
> >
>
> This is the response for "DMS List Stored Images":
>
> { [0] = '[ type = 'modem' maximum_images = '4' index_of_running_image
> = '4' sublist = '{ [0] = '[ storage_index = '1' failure_count = '0'
> unique_id = '{ [0] = '63 ' [1] = '95 ' [2] = '63 ' [3] = '0 ' [4] = '0
> ' [5] = '0 ' [6] = '0 ' [7] = '0 ' [8] = '0 ' [9] = '0 ' [10] = '0 '
> [11] = '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 ' [15] = '0 '}' build_id
> = '02.08.02.00_?' ] ' [1] = '[ storage_index = '2' failure_count = '0'
> unique_id = '{ [0] = '63 ' [1] = '95 ' [2] = '63 ' [3] = '0 ' [4] = '0
> ' [5] = '0 ' [6] = '0 ' [7] = '0 ' [8] = '0 ' [9] = '0 ' [10] = '0 '
> [11] = '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 ' [15] = '0 '}' build_id
> = '02.05.07.00_?' ] ' [2] = '[ storage_index = '3' failure_count = '0'
> unique_id = '{ [0] = '63 ' [1] = '95 ' [2] = '63 ' [3] = '0 ' [4] = '0
> ' [5] = '0 ' [6] = '0 ' [7] = '0 ' [8] = '0 ' [9] = '0 ' [10] = '0 '
> [11] = '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 ' [15] = '0 '}' build_id
> = '02.14.03.02_?' ] ' [3] = '[ storage_index = '4' fail
>  ure_count = '0' unique_id = '{ [0] = '63 ' [1] = '95 ' [2] = '63 '
> [3] = '0 ' [4] = '0 ' [5] = '0 ' [6] = '0 ' [7] = '0 ' [8] = '0 ' [9]
> = '0 ' [10] = '0 ' [11] = '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 '
> [15] = '0 '}' build_id = '02.24.03.00_?' ] '}' ] ' [1] = '[ type =
> 'pri' maximum_images = '50' index_of_running_image = '1' sublist = '{
> [0] = '[ storage_index = '255' failure_count = '255' unique_id = '{
> [0] = '48 ' [1] = '48 ' [2] = '50 ' [3] = '46 ' [4] = '48 ' [5] = '48
> ' [6] = '57 ' [7] = '95 ' [8] = '48 ' [9] = '48 ' [10] = '49 ' [11] =
> '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 ' [15] = '0 '}' build_id =
> '02.08.02.00_ATT' ] ' [1] = '[ storage_index = '255' failure_count =
> '255' unique_id = '{ [0] = '48 ' [1] = '48 ' [2] = '50 ' [3] = '46 '
> [4] = '48 ' [5] = '50 ' [6] = '49 ' [7] = '95 ' [8] = '48 ' [9] = '48
> ' [10] = '48 ' [11] = '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 ' [15] =
> '0 '}' build_id = '02.24.03.00_GENERIC' ] ' [2] = '[ storage_index =
> '255' failure_count = '255'
>   unique_id = '{ [0] = '48 ' [1] = '48 ' [2] = '50 ' [3] = '46 ' [4] =
> '48 ' [5] = '49 ' [6] = '50 ' [7] = '95 ' [8] = '48 ' [9] = '48 ' [10]
> = '49 ' [11] = '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 ' [15] = '0 '}'
> build_id = '02.14.03.02_SPRINT' ] ' [3] = '[ storage_index = '255'
> failure_count = '255' unique_id = '{ [0] = '48 ' [1] = '48 ' [2] = '49
> ' [3] = '46 ' [4] = '48 ' [5] = '48 ' [6] = '48 ' [7] = '95 ' [8] =
> '48 ' [9] = '48 ' [10] = '48 ' [11] = '0 ' [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 '
> [14] = '0 ' [15] = '0 '}' build_id = '00.00.00.00_OEMPRI918' ] ' [4] =
> '[ storage_index = '255' failure_count = '255' unique_id = '{ [0] =
> '48 ' [1] = '48 ' [2] = '50 ' [3] = '46 ' [4] = '48 ' [5] = '48 ' [6]
> = '56 ' [7] = '95 ' [8] = '48 ' [9] = '48 ' [10] = '51 ' [11] = '0 '
> [12] = '0 ' [13] = '0 ' [14] = '0 ' [15] = '0 '}' build_id =
> '02.05.07.00_VERIZON' ] '}' ] '}
>
> Interestingly, if I'm reading this properly, you may be using the
> wrong modem+PRI image pair:  seems to me you're using modem image
> '02.24.03.00_?' and PRI image '02.08.02.00_ATT'; although I cannot
> totally confirm that due to issues in Sierra devices like this one:
> https://forum.sierrawireless.com/viewtopic.php?f=117&t=10198
>
> You could try to play a bit with the qmi-firmware-update tool and see
> if you can flash and run an exact modem+PRI pair, just to make sure
> that's not the issue.
>

That is interesting, I think I read somewhere thread about MC7455 not
coming from low power mode because of FW/PRI images mismatch. I know that
you suggested me to use qmi-firmware-update tool, but I still have old hdd
with original win7 somewhere. What I did was to download Generic
SWI9X30C_02.24.03.00 as win exe from here:

https://source.sierrawireless.com/resources/airprime/minicard/74xx/airprime-em_mc74xx-approved-fw-packages/

and then I used that windows tool to flash the card. It is said there that:
For Windows use the Windows EXE Download This will update both the PRI
(carrier provisioning file) and the firmware. I hope that card should not
be locked and therefore I used generic FW/PRI pair. I also installed the
drivers on win7 but I never used the card under it. Honestly I do not even
know how to configure it under windows. :-)

Reading your comment about PRI to be AT&T, do you suggest to flash card
again to AT&T SWI9X30C_02.20.03.00 instead generic pair?



> >>
> >> Unfortunately, fixing the low-power issue won't be the only problem if
> you
> >> want to run the modem in QMI mode. The MC7455 requires "raw-ip" support
> in
> >> the Linux kernel qmi_wwan driver, and the default kernel version coming
> in
> >> Ubuntu 16.04 is not new enough. I did prepre an additional PPA to
> include
> >> Linux 4.4 in Ubuntu 16.04, but note that I'm really not maintaining
> that one
> >> actively:
> >>
> >> https://launchpad.net/~aleksander-m/+archive/ubuntu/
> kernel-xenial-qmi-raw-ip
> <https://launchpad.net/%7Ealeksander-m/+archive/ubuntu/kernel-xenial-qmi-raw-ip>
> >
> >
> > Ubuntu 16.04.2 installs a 4.8 kernel for new installation - so I can
> check
> > for qmi_wwan driver to be loaded and provide exact kernel version
> installed.
> > Are there any other requirements? If so could it be possible to use DKMS
> to
> > build that driver for maintained mainstream kernel 4.8.?
> >
>
> Oh, any kernel newer than 4.4 would be good for you. Does 16.04
> install 4.8 via backports? I need to check that; the original 16.04
> comes with 4.3 IIRC.
>

You do not need backports to get 4.8. under Ubuntu 16.04. New installation
of 16.04.2 will install 4.8 as default. You can also update from 4.4. on
older 16.04.1 installation by updating HWE - find description for example
here:

https://askubuntu.com/questions/885054/upgrade-16-04-2-lts-to-kernel-version-4-8


>
> >>
> >> If you want to skip the kernel problem, you may want to switch the modem
> >> into MBIM mode; although I don't recall if there were missing MBIM fixes
> >> that would be required for this device in Linux 4.3; but worth testing
> (once
> >> you fix the low-power mode issue).
> >
> >
> > What mode do you suggest? QMI or MBIM? I know that there is some password
> > needed to apply some AT command to switch modes, but I didn't found exact
> > procedure. Also my card seems to be kind of not branded card, bought
> > directly from reseller, not delivered as part of my HW by Lenovo, so
> > password might differs.
> >>
> >>
> >> Or just switch to a newer Ubuntu version... :)
> >
> >
> > 18.04 is unfortunately not yet here... :-)
>
> How about 16.10 or 17.04? :)
>

eee 17.04 is not LTS and I prefer to use my NB after the setup pain is gone
for as long as possible. :-)


>
> --
> Aleksander
> https://aleksander.es
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/modemmanager-devel/attachments/20170607/e0a7649f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ModemManager-devel mailing list