<div dir="ltr">The new device filter policies mechanism may be nice to include, and would benefit from some testing in the field. </div> <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:42 AM Dan Williams <<a href="mailto:dcbw@redhat.com">dcbw@redhat.com</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 09:55 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Hey, > > It's been already a while since we released 1.6.0, and there are a > lot > of things in git master that haven't been released yet, so maybe it's > time for a 1.8.0 release. > > I see two big pending things that could get finished before doing > 1.8.0, which is the GTask migration and especially the new device > filter policies. Actually, the GTask migration itself isn't that > critical for a stable release, just a good thing to have, but we're > so > close to be fully migrated that it probably makes sense. > > The one big thing that may not get to 1.8.0 on time could be the > Infineon plugin... or maybe we could include what we have and fix it > properly for 1.8.x stable updates. > > What does everyone think? Sounds good; might be nice to get QMI LOC support but I don't think we need to block on that. Slowly working on it but not sure when I'd have enough to get a position fix. Dan </blockquote></div>