[Nice] Gracefull fallback, renegotiations?

mikhail.zabaluev at nokia.com mikhail.zabaluev at nokia.com
Thu Jul 3 09:25:13 PDT 2008


>-----Original Message-----
>From: nice-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org 
>[mailto:nice-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of ext 
>Olivier Crête
>Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 6:01 PM
>To: nice at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: [Nice] Gracefull fallback, renegotiations?
>On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 12:49 +0300, Kai.Vehmanen at nokia.com wrote:
>> In theory you might want to pick a different pair than what
>> was chosen as the best pair by standard ICE preference 
>> algorithms. But a better way to influence pair selection
>> is to adjust the local candidate preference values. 
>Will there be always only one socket per component/transport/af? So
>whichever local candidate we pick doesn't matter since they'll all be
>sending the exact same packets?

Don't you have to bind to every local interface, in order to send candidate checks properly?
It might matter with VPN and IP migration.

Best regards,

More information about the Nice mailing list