[Nice] New API and refactor
dafydd.harries at collabora.co.uk
Mon May 19 10:37:50 PDT 2008
Ar 15/05/2008 am 13:03, ysgrifennodd Youness Alaoui:
> Kai.Vehmanen at nokia.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On 14 May 2008, Youness Alaoui wrote:
> >> My first step now in making libnice 'nicer' will be to fix the
> >> repository by removing all those files that have nothing to do
> >> there... example :
> >> conncheck.h shouldn't be there
> > yep, go ahead. That was a merge accident (the file is not in my local
> > work tree, so I screwed the merge somewow).
> >> there are some vi/emacs temporary files in the repository
> >> there are some Makefile files in the repository (not .am)
> > Those must be from the darcs-git export as there are no
> > such files in the darcs tree.
> oups, my fault, i apparently thought there were some Makefile/temp files
> in there.. I just checked again, and apparently, there aren't.. sorry
> about that!
> >> Remi, if you have anything to suggest, please do so now. I
> >> also wanted to ask you what the stunbdc program was for ? is
> >> it just another misplaced test ? or does it actually need to
> > That's a interactive test client for the binding discovery
> > STUN usage (see stunbdc -h). It's a useful tool, but not
> > part of the library (nor test suite).
> > br,
> ok, can it go in tests/ then (but not part of make check) ? or you
> suggest moving it elsewhere ?
Only automated tests should go in tests/. If we really need to move it, it
could go in a tools/ directory, but I'm not really sure it needs to move.
More information about the Nice