[Nice] problem when using libnice0.0.12 and a tiny bug

[jiayu zeng]

Hi Youness,
Thanks for your reply! yes, I check my code again according your
suggestion,and I find a mistake, I set the wrong password when I use
nice_agent_set_remote_
credentials function. After I correctting this mistake, libnice works very
well!

thans for your help!


2010/6/12 Youness Alaoui <youness.alaoui at collabora.co.uk>

> Hi,
>
> First, I notice the Username/password are both NULL in your candidates..
> maybe
> you didn't set them correctly ? or if you're using the RFC compatibility
> mode,
> did you call the nice_agent_set_remote_credentials function ?
> You're not giving me enough information to understand your issue.. I don't
> know
> the compatibility mode you used, I don't have the logs from both sides
> either,
> make sure both sides are setting their candidates properly.
> Also, it fails to establish the connection because it doesn't receive any
> data..
> did you call the nice_agent_attach_recv function properly ?
> I also noticed that the only candidate you have is 10.1.31.222 which seems
> to be
> a local candidate, if the call is not being made inside the same local
> netword,
> then it won't work, you might need to set the STUN server on your agent for
> it
> to do proper NAT traversal.
>
> Youness.
>
> jiayu zeng wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >       I use libnice0.0.12 in our project to do NAT traversing, however
> > there is a problem.
> >      when I get peer's candidates and then using
> > nice_agent_set_remote_candidates() to set candidates, however the
> > connection check always fail! here is the debug message:
> >
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868: set_remote_candidates 1
> 1
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : Adding remote
> > candidate with addr [10.1.31.222]:56708 for s1/c1. U/P '(null)'/'(null)'
> > prio: 152912400
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : creating new pair
> > 0x91e5e28 state 5
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : Adding remote
> > candidate with addr [10.1.31.222]:56708
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : added a new conncheck
> > 0x91e5e28 with foundation of '1:1' to list 1.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : stream 1 component 1
> > STATE-CHANGE 1 -> 2.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : Pair 0x91e5e28 with
> > s/c-id 1/1 (1:1) unfrozen.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : pair 0x91e5e28 state
> > WAITING remote candidate addr[10.1.31.222]:56708
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 :
> > priv_conn_check_unfreeze_next returned 1
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : pair 0x91e5e28 state
> > IN_PROGRESS
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 :  remote candidate with
> > addr [10.1.31.222]:56708
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: pair 0x91e5e28 Agent 0x91bb868 : STUN-CC
> > REQ to '10.1.31.222 <http://10.1.31.222>:34013', socket=8, pair=1:1
> > (c-id:1), tie=16361108746083089059, username='l=\u001c    ' (0),
> > password='' (0), priority=1845494271.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : STUN connectivity
> > check was cancelled, marking as done.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : pair 0x91e5e28 state
> > FAILED
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : timer tick #1: 0
> > frozen, 0 in-progress, 0 waiting, 0 succeeded, 0 discovered, 0
> > nominated, 0 waiting-for-nom.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 :
> > priv_conn_check_tick_unlocked returned 1
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 :
> > conn_check_schedule_next returning 1
> >
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : timer tick #2: 0
> > frozen, 0 in-progress, 0 waiting, 0 succeeded, 0 discovered, 0
> > nominated, 0 waiting-for-nom.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 :
> > priv_conn_check_tick_unlocked: stopping conncheck timer
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : stream 1 component 1
> > STATE-CHANGE 2 -> 5.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : conn.check list
> > status: 0 nominated, 0 succeeded, c-id 1.
> > (process:18123): libnice-DEBUG: Agent 0x91bb868 : changing conncheck
> > state to COMPLETED.
> >
> > I found that the peer's port is erro in the debug message, and then I
> > find a debug bug in conncheck.c line 1657,should we use ntohs here??but
> > this is not the essencial problem. I use netstat -aun in peer, and I
> > find the udp port 56708 is opend,but why the connection check always
> fail?
> >
> > I'm soory for my poor english, but hope you can understand what I say:)
> >
> > thanks a lot!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nice mailing list
> > Nice at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nice
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nice/attachments/20100626/1a2c93c0/attachment.html>