[Nice] [PATCH] Make set_remote_candidates return the correct value

[Rohan Garg]

Right, thanks for the clarification on this. Please disregard this patch :)

Best
Rohan Garg

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Youness Alaoui
<youness.alaoui at collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> Yeah, actually, it shouldn't. An error in this case would be an invalid stream
> or component id.. that's an error, but not being able to add any should just
> return 0.. I think if you want to check for an error, you can check for 'bb-1',
> but if you want to check for 'invalid candidates', you can check for 'ret <
> num_cands' or '== 0'
>
>
> On 03/30/2012 03:00 PM, Rohan Garg wrote:
>> A follow up remark, the documentation says that it returns -1 on a
>> error, depending on whether or not you consider a invalid NiceAddress
>> a error, this patch may/may not be relevant.
>>
>> Best
>> Rohan Garg
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Rohan Garg <rohan16garg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> If I understood the code correctly, in set_remote_candidates if every
>>> remote candidate in the list is invalid or when
>>> priv_add_remote_candidate returns false for every candidate, 'added'
>>> remains as 0 whereas the correct value should be -1 since no
>>> candidates were added for connchecks. I've added a patch that fixes
>>> this issue.
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Rohan Garg
>> _______________________________________________
>> nice mailing list
>> nice at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nice
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nice mailing list
> nice at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nice
>