[libnice] [nice] recommended OSS STUN/TURN server

[Klaus Kranz]

Dear Philip,
the authentication can be ruled out.
The tests have been conducted on a rental machine in the cloud.
Now our IT department has setup a machine in our premises facing the public
and bingo the rfc5766 server worked out of the box.
I will send you another mail with a trace attached.
Rgds
Klaus
-----Original Message-----
From: nice [mailto:nice-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Philip
Withnall
Sent: Freitag, 28. November 2014 17:02
To: nice at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [libnice] [nice] recommended OSS STUN/TURN server

That seems very odd. Are the connections to the various TURN servers failing
due to a lack of authentication? Try disabling authentication in their
configuration, and using libnice in NICE_COMPATIBILITY_GOOGLE mode (which
disables authentication). (Note that this isn’t a deployable solution — the
actual solution would require runtime sharing of credentials between your
signalling server and the TURN servers.)

Can’t really debug this without logs from the TURN servers.

Philip

On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 14:01 +0100, Klaus Kranz wrote:
> Each of the recommended servers fail alone.
> Libnice was not able to setup a connection using rfc5466-turn-server
> supplied relay candidates--> so no TURN Libnice always uses relay
> candidates if supplied by Turnserver.org  -> so no STUN
>
> After a journey trying out different setups , I got one to work, which is:
> rfc5466-turn-server  with option  -stun-only and turnserver.org co
> installed on 1 node.
> With this setup libnice is able to have STUN and TURN based sessions.
>
> Of course this is not the desired solution, so I still wonder if one
> made same experience.
>
> It looks like rfc server doesn't propagate send invitations properly.
> All msg exchanges up to this point seem to be ok Rgds Klaus
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Crête [mailto:olivier.crete at collabora.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 14. November 2014 17:33
> To: Klaus Kranz; nice at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [libnice] [nice] recommended OSS STUN/TURN server
>
> Hi,
>
> I've never tried coTurn, you may want to look at the libnice log produce
> with G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all NICE_DEBUG=all, if you can't make any sense from
> them, please post them here.
>
> Olivier
>
> On 11/14/2014 10:22 AM, Klaus Kranz wrote:
> > Dear Olivier,
> > thanks a lot. I've followed the rfc5466-turn-server  which leads to
> > coTurn.
> > So I tried coTurn. It worked out-of-the-box for STUN but libnice
> > didn't gather relay candidates.
> > I could see that the TURN ALLOCATIONS went ok, but...
> >
> > Do you have any idea what can go wrong ?
> > Rgds
> > Klaus
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nice [mailto:nice-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> > Olivier Crête
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 13. November 2014 17:59
> > To: nice at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [libnice] [nice] recommended OSS STUN/TURN server
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are 2 good open source turn servers, turnserver.org and
> > rfc5466-turn-server.
> >
> > On 13/11/14 03:13 AM, Klaus Kranz wrote:
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> does somebody have a recommendation for an open source STUN/TURN
> >> server, confirming a well functioning behaviour.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Rgds
> >>
> >> Klaus
> >>
> >>
> >> .
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nice mailing list
> >> nice at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nice
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Olivier Crête
> > olivier.crete at collabora.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > nice mailing list
> > nice at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nice
> >
>
> --
> Olivier Crête
> olivier.crete at collabora.com
>

-- 
.