[Nouveau] reply-to header

[Marcin Slusarz]

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:00:57PM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Afaik the absence of that header is the reason that the reply button
> in mail clients or in gmail answers to the sender rather than to the
> mailing list.
> Does anyone know why that header is not included ?
> I consider it a must have for any mailing list, without reply-to it's
> quite impractical.

and what about people who are not subscribed? with "reply-to" header
would "reply" still cc them?

> Or is everyone used to use reply-all or something, which includes the
> ML in CC, and no one does the same mistake than me ?

i always reply-to-all, because...

> Maybe the problem is just me, as I only used mailing lists that filled
> reply-to correctly before.

... I have an opposite experience, but maybe it's just me ;)