[Nouveau] reply-to header

[Xavier]

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Erik Auerswald
<auerswal at unix-ag.uni-kl.de> wrote:
>
> No, it would omit them. Thus for open mailing lists no reply-to header
> should be used. At least some ML software can be configured to remove
> duplicates (i.e. don't send message to recipients in CC). Of course the
> MUA's "reply all" functionality should be used when working with open MLs.
>
> Some MUAs (e.g. mutt) have a "list reply" functionality that can be used to
> send to the ML only.
>

I see, I guess that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
The previous ML I used indeed required a subscription.