[Nouveau] [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: add lockless dynamic semaphore allocator
Francisco Jerez
currojerez at riseup.net
Mon Feb 1 04:56:07 PST 2010
Luca Barbieri <luca at luca-barbieri.com> writes:
> This patch adds code to allocate semaphores in a dynamic way using
> an algorithm with a lockless fast path.
>
> 1. Semaphore BOs
>
> Semaphore BOs are BOs containing semaphores. Each is 4KB large and
> contains 1024 4-byte semaphores. They are pinned.
>
> Semaphore BOs are allocated on-demand and freed at device takedown.
> Those that are not fully allocated are kept on a free list.
>
> Each is assigned an handle. DMA objects and references are created
> on demand for each channel that needs to use a semaphore BO.
> Those objects and references are automatically destroyed at channel
> destruction time.
>
> Typically only a single semaphore BO will be needed.
>
> 2. Semaphore allocation
>
> Each semaphore BO contains a bitmask of free semaphores within the BO.
> Allocation is done in a lockless fashion using a count of free
> semaphores and the bitmask.
>
> Semaphores are released once the fence on the waiting side passed.
> This is done by adding fields to nouveau_fence.
>
> Semaphore values are zeroed when the semaphore BO is allocated, and
> are afterwards only modified by the GPU.
>
> This is performed by storing a bitmask that allows to alternate
> between using the values 0 and 1 for a given semaphore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Barbieri <luca at luca-barbieri.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 7 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c | 4 +
> 4 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h
> index dabfd65..0658979 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ enum {
> NvGdiRect = 0x8000000c,
> NvImageBlit = 0x8000000d,
> NvSw = 0x8000000e,
> + NvSem = 0x81000000, /* range of 16M handles */
>
> /* G80+ display objects */
> NvEvoVRAM = 0x01000000,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> index 2b78ee6..0a7abc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> @@ -620,6 +620,11 @@ struct drm_nouveau_private {
> struct {
> struct dentry *channel_root;
> } debugfs;
> +
> + spinlock_t sem_bo_free_list_lock;
> + struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo_free_list;
> + atomic_t sem_handles;
> + uint32_t sem_max_handles;
> };
>
> static inline struct drm_nouveau_private *
> @@ -1141,6 +1146,8 @@ extern int nouveau_fence_flush(void *obj, void *arg);
> extern void nouveau_fence_unref(void **obj);
> extern void *nouveau_fence_ref(void *obj);
> extern void nouveau_fence_handler(struct drm_device *dev, int channel);
> +extern void nouveau_fence_device_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> +extern void nouveau_fence_device_takedown(struct drm_device *dev);
>
> /* nouveau_gem.c */
> extern int nouveau_gem_new(struct drm_device *, struct nouveau_channel *,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> index 9b1c2c3..01152f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,13 @@
>
> #define USE_REFCNT (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_10)
>
> +#define NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> +
> +/* reading fences can be very expensive
> + * use a threshold that would only use up half a single sem_bo
> + */
> +#define NOUVEAU_SEM_MIN_THRESHOLD (NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE / (NOUVEAU_MAX_CHANNEL_NR * 2))
> +
> struct nouveau_fence {
> struct nouveau_channel *channel;
> struct kref refcount;
> @@ -47,6 +54,218 @@ nouveau_fence(void *sync_obj)
> return (struct nouveau_fence *)sync_obj;
> }
>
> +struct nouveau_sem_bo {
> + struct nouveau_sem_bo *next;
> + struct nouveau_bo *bo;
> + uint32_t handle;
> +
> + /* >= 0: num_free + 1 slots are free, sem_bo is or is about to be on free_list
> + -1: all allocated, sem_bo is NOT on free_list
> + */
> + atomic_t num_free;
> +
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(free_slots, NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE / sizeof(uint32_t));
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(values, NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE / sizeof(uint32_t));
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(channels, NOUVEAU_MAX_CHANNEL_NR);
> +};
> +
> +struct nouveau_sem {
> + struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo;
> + unsigned num;
> + uint32_t value;
> +};
> +
> +struct nouveau_sem_bo*
> +nouveau_sem_bo_alloc(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo = kmalloc(sizeof(*sem_bo), GFP_KERNEL);
> + struct nouveau_bo *bo;
> + int flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM;
> + int ret;
> + bool is_iomem;
> + void *mem;
> +
> + sem_bo = kmalloc(sizeof(*sem_bo), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!sem_bo)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = nouveau_bo_new(dev, NULL, NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE, 0, flags,
> + 0, 0x0000, true, true, &bo);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + sem_bo->bo = bo;
> +
> + ret = nouveau_bo_pin(bo, flags);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_bo;
> +
> + ret = nouveau_bo_map(bo);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_unpin;
> +
> + mem = ttm_kmap_obj_virtual(&bo->kmap, &is_iomem);
> + if (is_iomem)
> + memset_io(mem, 0, NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE);
> + else
> + memset(mem, 0, NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE);
> +
> + nouveau_bo_unmap(bo);
> +
> + memset((void *)sem_bo->free_slots, 0xff, sizeof(sem_bo->free_slots));
> + memset((void *)sem_bo->values, 0xff, sizeof(sem_bo->values));
> + atomic_set(&sem_bo->num_free, sizeof(sem_bo->free_slots) * 8 - 1);
> +
> + memset((void *)sem_bo->channels, 0, sizeof(sem_bo->channels));
> +
> + return sem_bo;
> +
> +out_unpin:
> + nouveau_bo_unpin(sem_bo->bo);
> +out_bo:
> + nouveau_bo_ref(0, &sem_bo->bo);
> +out_free:
> + kfree(sem_bo);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +nouveau_sem_bo_channel_dtor(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct nouveau_gpuobj *gpuobj) {
> + if (gpuobj->priv) {
> + struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo;
> + struct nouveau_channel *chan = gpuobj->im_channel;
> + sem_bo = (struct nouveau_sem_bo *)gpuobj->priv;
> +
> + clear_bit(chan->id, sem_bo->channels);
> + smp_wmb();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int
> +nouveau_sem_bo_channel_init(struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo, struct nouveau_channel *chan)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = chan->dev;
> + struct nouveau_gpuobj *obj = NULL;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (test_bit(chan->id, sem_bo->channels))
> + return 0;
> +
> + BUG_ON(sem_bo->bo->bo.mem.mem_type != TTM_PL_VRAM);
> +
> + ret = nouveau_gpuobj_dma_new(chan, NV_CLASS_DMA_IN_MEMORY,
> + sem_bo->bo->bo.mem.mm_node->start, NOUVEAU_SEM_BO_SIZE,
> + NV_DMA_ACCESS_RW, NV_DMA_TARGET_VIDMEM, &obj);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + obj->dtor = nouveau_sem_bo_channel_dtor;
> + obj->priv = sem_bo;
> +
> + ret = nouveau_gpuobj_ref_add(dev, chan, sem_bo->handle, obj, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + nouveau_gpuobj_del(dev, &obj);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + set_bit(chan->id, sem_bo->channels);
> + smp_wmb();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +nouveau_sem_bo_free(struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo)
> +{
> + nouveau_bo_unpin(sem_bo->bo);
> + nouveau_bo_ref(0, &sem_bo->bo);
> + kfree(sem_bo);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +nouveau_sem_bo_enqueue(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo)
> +{
> + struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +
> + spin_lock(&dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list_lock);
> + sem_bo->next = dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list;
> + dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list = sem_bo;
> + spin_unlock(&dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list_lock);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +nouveau_sem_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_sem *sem)
> +{
> + struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo = 0;
> + int v;
> +
> +retry:
> + sem_bo = dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list;
> + if (!sem_bo) {
> + unsigned handle;
> +
> + if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->sem_handles) >= dev_priv->sem_max_handles)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* this works because sem_handles <= sem_max_handles + NR_CPUS */
> + handle = atomic_add_return(1, &dev_priv->sem_handles) - 1;
> +
> + if (handle >= dev_priv->sem_max_handles)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sem_bo = nouveau_sem_bo_alloc(dev);
> + if (!sem_bo)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + sem_bo->handle = NvSem + handle;
> +
> + atomic_dec(&sem_bo->num_free);
> + nouveau_sem_bo_enqueue(dev, sem_bo);
> + } else {
> + if (unlikely(!atomic_add_unless(&sem_bo->num_free, -1, 0))) {
> + spin_lock(&dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list_lock);
> + if (unlikely(sem_bo != dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list)) {
> + spin_unlock(&dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list_lock);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list = sem_bo->next;
> + if (atomic_dec_return(&sem_bo->num_free) >= 0)
> + dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list = sem_bo;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list_lock);
> + }
> + }
> +
> +retry_bit:
> + v = find_first_bit(sem_bo->free_slots, sizeof(sem_bo->free_slots) * 8);
> +
> + /* we reserved our bit by decrementing num_free
> + however, the first available bit may have been taken */
> + BUG_ON(v >= sizeof(sem_bo->free_slots) * 8);
> +
> + if (unlikely(!test_and_clear_bit(v, sem_bo->free_slots)))
> + goto retry_bit;
> +
> + sem->sem_bo = sem_bo;
> + sem->value = test_and_change_bit(v, sem_bo->values);
> + sem->num = v;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
It seems to me this code could be hugely simplified using a plain
spinlock. The locklessness of this patch is really cool but I have
doubts it will pay off...
How often do we expect cross-channel sync to kick in? Maybe 2-3 times
per frame? I suspect contentions will be rare enough to make spinlocks
as fast as atomics for all real-life cases, and they don't have such a
high maintainability cost. What do you guys think?
> +void
> +nouveau_sem_release(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo, int i)
> +{
> + set_bit(i, sem_bo->free_slots);
> +
> + if (atomic_inc_and_test(&sem_bo->num_free))
> + nouveau_sem_bo_enqueue(dev, sem_bo);
> +}
> +
> static void
> nouveau_fence_del(struct kref *ref)
> {
> @@ -266,3 +485,27 @@ nouveau_fence_fini(struct nouveau_channel *chan)
> }
> }
>
> +void
> +nouveau_fence_device_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list_lock);
> + dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list = 0;
> + atomic_set(&dev_priv->sem_handles, 0);
> + /* these are each pinned and 4KB, providing 1024 semaphores each
> + we should need only one in normal circumstances */
> + dev_priv->sem_max_handles = 16;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +nouveau_fence_device_takedown(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct nouveau_sem_bo *sem_bo, *next;
> + /* all the sem_bos allocated must be in the free list since all channels
> + * and thus fences have already been terminated */
> + for (sem_bo = dev_priv->sem_bo_free_list; sem_bo; sem_bo = next) {
> + next = sem_bo->next;
> + nouveau_sem_bo_free(sem_bo);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> index fcd7610..7161981 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,8 @@ nouveau_card_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> if (ret)
> goto out_mem;
>
> + nouveau_fence_device_init(dev);
> +
> /* PMC */
> ret = engine->mc.init(dev);
> if (ret)
> @@ -532,6 +534,8 @@ static void nouveau_card_takedown(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->timer.takedown(dev);
> engine->mc.takedown(dev);
>
> + nouveau_fence_device_takedown(dev);
> +
> mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> ttm_bo_clean_mm(&dev_priv->ttm.bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM);
> ttm_bo_clean_mm(&dev_priv->ttm.bdev, TTM_PL_TT);
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20100201/39f7ccbf/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Nouveau
mailing list