[Nouveau] [PATCH] Add PFIFO and PGRAPH pausing methods
Francisco Jerez
currojerez at riseup.net
Wed Jan 12 12:27:36 PST 2011
Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still working on getting the reclocking work done right. There are
> several parts I identify:
> - Pausing PFIFO (with its caches), pause PGRAPH and wait for idle
> - Stop some PLL (I guess it is more, physically disconnect them from
> the engines) using the 0xc040 register.
> - reclock memory
> - reclock the other engines
> - Make sure the display doesn't blow up
> Depending on the cards, I have completed all of the steps or none.
>
> Anyway, pausing PFIFO and PGRAPH works well on all the card I tested
> and so, I would like it to be pushed.
> I have a new theory upon the PLL_SUPERVISOR(0xc040) that I want to
> test. When I'm done with this, I'll put together a patch for it and
> continue on the other steps.
>
> Please provide me with some feedback on the patch or push it if
> nothing bothers you.
>
Thanks, some comments inline.
> Martin
>
> PS: I'm quite busy at the moment, I'll write an in-depth mail when
> I've verified my theories and got proper support on other cards than
> the nv86 ones.
>
> From f7ad98f4a857dd4b1892712d15f93c13eb0669e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at ensi-bourges.fr>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:44:05 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Pause PFIFO and PGRAPH before reclocking
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres at ensi-bourges.fr>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 15 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_pm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_reg.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c | 16 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c | 20 +++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 7 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> index 6d749b7..b0c52c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> @@ -359,6 +359,12 @@ struct nouveau_fifo_engine {
> int (*load_context)(struct nouveau_channel *);
> int (*unload_context)(struct drm_device *);
> void (*tlb_flush)(struct drm_device *dev);
> +
> + int (*pause)(struct drm_device *);
> + void (*unpause)(struct drm_device *);
> +
> + int (*cache_pause)(struct drm_device *);
> + void (*cache_unpause)(struct drm_device *);
You could fold fifo->cache_pause() into fifo->pause(). I don't see any
reason to have two separate pairs of callbacks here, they're always
going to be called one after the other.
> };
>
> struct nouveau_pgraph_engine {
> @@ -383,6 +389,9 @@ struct nouveau_pgraph_engine {
> void (*tlb_flush)(struct drm_device *dev);
>
> void (*set_tile_region)(struct drm_device *dev, int i);
> +
> + int (*pause)(struct drm_device *);
> + void (*unpause)(struct drm_device *);
> };
>
> struct nouveau_display_engine {
> @@ -1094,6 +1103,8 @@ extern void nv04_fifo_destroy_context(struct nouveau_channel *);
> extern int nv04_fifo_load_context(struct nouveau_channel *);
> extern int nv04_fifo_unload_context(struct drm_device *);
> extern void nv04_fifo_isr(struct drm_device *);
> +extern void nv04_fifo_cache_pause(struct drm_device *dev);
> +extern void nv04_fifo_cache_unpause(struct drm_device *dev);
>
> /* nv10_fifo.c */
> extern int nv10_fifo_init(struct drm_device *);
> @@ -1117,6 +1128,8 @@ extern void nv50_fifo_destroy_context(struct nouveau_channel *);
> extern int nv50_fifo_load_context(struct nouveau_channel *);
> extern int nv50_fifo_unload_context(struct drm_device *);
> extern void nv50_fifo_tlb_flush(struct drm_device *dev);
> +extern int nv50_fifo_pause(struct drm_device *);
> +extern void nv50_fifo_unpause(struct drm_device *);
>
> /* nvc0_fifo.c */
> extern int nvc0_fifo_init(struct drm_device *);
> @@ -1189,6 +1202,8 @@ extern int nv50_graph_unload_context(struct drm_device *);
> extern int nv50_grctx_init(struct nouveau_grctx *);
> extern void nv50_graph_tlb_flush(struct drm_device *dev);
> extern void nv86_graph_tlb_flush(struct drm_device *dev);
> +extern int nv50_graph_pause(struct drm_device *dev);
> +extern void nv50_graph_unpause(struct drm_device *dev);
> extern struct nouveau_enum nv50_data_error_names[];
>
> /* nvc0_graph.c */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_pm.c
> index fb846a3..233deec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_pm.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ nouveau_pm_perflvl_set(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_pm_level *perflvl)
> {
> struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct nouveau_pm_engine *pm = &dev_priv->engine.pm;
> + unsigned long flags;
> int ret;
>
> if (perflvl == pm->cur)
> @@ -72,13 +73,42 @@ nouveau_pm_perflvl_set(struct drm_device *dev, struct nouveau_pm_level *perflvl)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Do not allow the card to allocate/destroy a
> + * new channel while reclocking.
> + */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Pause the engines, if possible */
> + if (dev_priv->engine.fifo.pause(dev)) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + dev_priv->engine.fifo.cache_pause(dev);
> + if (dev_priv->engine.graph.pause(dev)) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
Just nitpicking here, but, if pause() is already returning an errno you
should just pass the same thing on, like:
| ret = dev_priv->engine.fifo.pause(dev);
| if (ret)
| goto out;
|
| ret = dev_priv->engine.graph.pause(dev);
| if (ret)
| goto out;
> +
> nouveau_pm_clock_set(dev, perflvl, PLL_CORE, perflvl->core);
> nouveau_pm_clock_set(dev, perflvl, PLL_SHADER, perflvl->shader);
> nouveau_pm_clock_set(dev, perflvl, PLL_MEMORY, perflvl->memory);
> nouveau_pm_clock_set(dev, perflvl, PLL_UNK05, perflvl->unk05);
>
> + /* Wait for PLLs to stabilize */
> + udelay(100);
> +
> pm->cur = perflvl;
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
> +
> +out:
> + /* Un-pause the engines */
> + dev_priv->engine.fifo.cache_unpause(dev);
> + dev_priv->engine.graph.unpause(dev);
> + dev_priv->engine.fifo.unpause(dev);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->context_switch_lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_reg.h
> index 04e8fb7..1722d13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_reg.h
> @@ -695,8 +695,11 @@
> #define NV50_PROM__ESIZE 0x10000
>
> #define NV50_PGRAPH 0x00400000
> +#define NV50_PGRAPH_CONTROL 0x00400500
> +#define NV50_PGRAPH_STATUS 0x00400700
> #define NV50_PGRAPH__LEN 0x1
> #define NV50_PGRAPH__ESIZE 0x10000
> +#define NV50_PFIFO_FREEZE 0x2504
>
> #define NV50_PDISPLAY 0x00610000
> #define NV50_PDISPLAY_OBJECTS 0x00610010
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> index d5b17b6..c149cf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_state.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,12 @@
> static void nouveau_stub_takedown(struct drm_device *dev) {}
> static int nouveau_stub_init(struct drm_device *dev) { return 0; }
>
> +int nouveau_fifo_pause_dummy(struct drm_device *dev) { return 0; }
> +void nouveau_fifo_unpause_dummy(struct drm_device *dev) { }
> +
> +int nouveau_graph_pause_dummy(struct drm_device *dev) { return 0; }
> +void nouveau_graph_unpause_dummy(struct drm_device *dev) {}
This is just the nv04- implementation of graph->(un)pause(), nv04_graph.c
is the best place for it, and I'd call it "nv04_graph_(un)pause" for the
sake of consistency.
> +
> static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_nouveau_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -73,6 +79,8 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->graph.destroy_context = nv04_graph_destroy_context;
> engine->graph.load_context = nv04_graph_load_context;
> engine->graph.unload_context = nv04_graph_unload_context;
> + engine->graph.pause = nouveau_graph_pause_dummy;
> + engine->graph.unpause = nouveau_graph_unpause_dummy;
> engine->fifo.channels = 16;
> engine->fifo.init = nv04_fifo_init;
> engine->fifo.takedown = nv04_fifo_fini;
> @@ -85,6 +93,10 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->fifo.destroy_context = nv04_fifo_destroy_context;
> engine->fifo.load_context = nv04_fifo_load_context;
> engine->fifo.unload_context = nv04_fifo_unload_context;
> + engine->fifo.pause = nouveau_fifo_pause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.unpause = nouveau_fifo_unpause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.cache_pause = nv04_fifo_cache_pause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_unpause = nv04_fifo_cache_unpause;
> engine->display.early_init = nv04_display_early_init;
> engine->display.late_takedown = nv04_display_late_takedown;
> engine->display.create = nv04_display_create;
> @@ -132,6 +144,8 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->graph.load_context = nv10_graph_load_context;
> engine->graph.unload_context = nv10_graph_unload_context;
> engine->graph.set_tile_region = nv10_graph_set_tile_region;
> + engine->graph.pause = nouveau_graph_pause_dummy;
> + engine->graph.unpause = nouveau_graph_unpause_dummy;
> engine->fifo.channels = 32;
> engine->fifo.init = nv10_fifo_init;
> engine->fifo.takedown = nv04_fifo_fini;
> @@ -144,6 +158,10 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->fifo.destroy_context = nv04_fifo_destroy_context;
> engine->fifo.load_context = nv10_fifo_load_context;
> engine->fifo.unload_context = nv10_fifo_unload_context;
> + engine->fifo.pause = nouveau_fifo_pause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.unpause = nouveau_fifo_unpause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.cache_pause = nv04_fifo_cache_pause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_unpause = nv04_fifo_cache_unpause;
> engine->display.early_init = nv04_display_early_init;
> engine->display.late_takedown = nv04_display_late_takedown;
> engine->display.create = nv04_display_create;
> @@ -191,6 +209,8 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->graph.load_context = nv20_graph_load_context;
> engine->graph.unload_context = nv20_graph_unload_context;
> engine->graph.set_tile_region = nv20_graph_set_tile_region;
> + engine->graph.pause = nouveau_graph_pause_dummy;
> + engine->graph.unpause = nouveau_graph_unpause_dummy;
> engine->fifo.channels = 32;
> engine->fifo.init = nv10_fifo_init;
> engine->fifo.takedown = nv04_fifo_fini;
> @@ -203,6 +223,10 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->fifo.destroy_context = nv04_fifo_destroy_context;
> engine->fifo.load_context = nv10_fifo_load_context;
> engine->fifo.unload_context = nv10_fifo_unload_context;
> + engine->fifo.pause = nouveau_fifo_pause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.unpause = nouveau_fifo_unpause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.cache_pause = nv04_fifo_cache_pause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_unpause = nv04_fifo_cache_unpause;
> engine->display.early_init = nv04_display_early_init;
> engine->display.late_takedown = nv04_display_late_takedown;
> engine->display.create = nv04_display_create;
> @@ -250,6 +274,8 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->graph.load_context = nv20_graph_load_context;
> engine->graph.unload_context = nv20_graph_unload_context;
> engine->graph.set_tile_region = nv20_graph_set_tile_region;
> + engine->graph.pause = nouveau_graph_pause_dummy;
> + engine->graph.unpause = nouveau_graph_unpause_dummy;
> engine->fifo.channels = 32;
> engine->fifo.init = nv10_fifo_init;
> engine->fifo.takedown = nv04_fifo_fini;
> @@ -262,6 +288,10 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->fifo.destroy_context = nv04_fifo_destroy_context;
> engine->fifo.load_context = nv10_fifo_load_context;
> engine->fifo.unload_context = nv10_fifo_unload_context;
> + engine->fifo.pause = nouveau_fifo_pause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.unpause = nouveau_fifo_unpause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.cache_pause = nv04_fifo_cache_pause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_unpause = nv04_fifo_cache_unpause;
> engine->display.early_init = nv04_display_early_init;
> engine->display.late_takedown = nv04_display_late_takedown;
> engine->display.create = nv04_display_create;
> @@ -312,6 +342,8 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->graph.load_context = nv40_graph_load_context;
> engine->graph.unload_context = nv40_graph_unload_context;
> engine->graph.set_tile_region = nv40_graph_set_tile_region;
> + engine->graph.pause = nouveau_graph_pause_dummy;
> + engine->graph.unpause = nouveau_graph_unpause_dummy;
> engine->fifo.channels = 32;
> engine->fifo.init = nv40_fifo_init;
> engine->fifo.takedown = nv04_fifo_fini;
> @@ -324,6 +356,10 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->fifo.destroy_context = nv04_fifo_destroy_context;
> engine->fifo.load_context = nv40_fifo_load_context;
> engine->fifo.unload_context = nv40_fifo_unload_context;
> + engine->fifo.pause = nouveau_fifo_pause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.unpause = nouveau_fifo_unpause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.cache_pause = nv04_fifo_cache_pause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_unpause = nv04_fifo_cache_unpause;
> engine->display.early_init = nv04_display_early_init;
> engine->display.late_takedown = nv04_display_late_takedown;
> engine->display.create = nv04_display_create;
> @@ -376,6 +412,8 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->graph.destroy_context = nv50_graph_destroy_context;
> engine->graph.load_context = nv50_graph_load_context;
> engine->graph.unload_context = nv50_graph_unload_context;
> + engine->graph.pause = nv50_graph_pause;
> + engine->graph.unpause = nv50_graph_unpause;
> if (dev_priv->chipset != 0x86)
> engine->graph.tlb_flush = nv50_graph_tlb_flush;
> else {
> @@ -397,6 +435,10 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->fifo.load_context = nv50_fifo_load_context;
> engine->fifo.unload_context = nv50_fifo_unload_context;
> engine->fifo.tlb_flush = nv50_fifo_tlb_flush;
> + engine->fifo.pause = nv50_fifo_pause;
> + engine->fifo.unpause = nv50_fifo_unpause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_pause = nv04_fifo_cache_pause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_unpause = nv04_fifo_cache_unpause;
> engine->display.early_init = nv50_display_early_init;
> engine->display.late_takedown = nv50_display_late_takedown;
> engine->display.create = nv50_display_create;
> @@ -484,6 +526,8 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->graph.destroy_context = nvc0_graph_destroy_context;
> engine->graph.load_context = nvc0_graph_load_context;
> engine->graph.unload_context = nvc0_graph_unload_context;
> + engine->graph.pause = nouveau_graph_pause_dummy;
> + engine->graph.unpause = nouveau_graph_unpause_dummy;
> engine->fifo.channels = 128;
> engine->fifo.init = nvc0_fifo_init;
> engine->fifo.takedown = nvc0_fifo_takedown;
> @@ -495,6 +539,10 @@ static int nouveau_init_engine_ptrs(struct drm_device *dev)
> engine->fifo.destroy_context = nvc0_fifo_destroy_context;
> engine->fifo.load_context = nvc0_fifo_load_context;
> engine->fifo.unload_context = nvc0_fifo_unload_context;
> + engine->fifo.pause = nouveau_fifo_pause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.unpause = nouveau_fifo_unpause_dummy;
> + engine->fifo.cache_pause = nv04_fifo_cache_pause;
> + engine->fifo.cache_unpause = nv04_fifo_cache_unpause;
> engine->display.early_init = nv50_display_early_init;
> engine->display.late_takedown = nv50_display_late_takedown;
> engine->display.create = nv50_display_create;
> @@ -893,7 +941,7 @@ static int nouveau_remove_conflicting_drivers(struct drm_device *dev)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> primary = dev->pdev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].flags & IORESOURCE_ROM_SHADOW;
> #endif
> -
> +
> remove_conflicting_framebuffers(dev_priv->apertures, "nouveaufb", primary);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1199,4 +1247,3 @@ bool nouveau_wait_for_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> return true;
> }
> -
This is unrelated clean-up, please split it into separate patches if you
made them on purpose.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c
> index f89d104..df84586 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fifo.c
> @@ -530,3 +530,19 @@ nv04_fifo_isr(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> nv_wr32(dev, NV03_PMC_INTR_0, NV_PMC_INTR_0_PFIFO_PENDING);
> }
> +
> +void
> +nv04_fifo_cache_pause(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + nv04_fifo_reassign(dev, false);
> + nv04_fifo_cache_pull(dev, false);
> + nv_mask(dev, NV04_PFIFO_CACHE1_DMA_PUSH, 0x1, 0);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +nv04_fifo_cache_unpause(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + nv_mask(dev, NV04_PFIFO_CACHE1_DMA_PUSH, 0, 0x1);
> + nv04_fifo_cache_pull(dev, true);
> + nv04_fifo_reassign(dev, true);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c
> index 8dd04c5..90a3dc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_fifo.c
> @@ -501,3 +501,23 @@ nv50_fifo_tlb_flush(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> nv50_vm_flush_engine(dev, 5);
> }
> +
> +int
> +nv50_fifo_pause(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + nv_wr32(dev, NV50_PFIFO_FREEZE, 1);
> +
> + /* Wait up to 10ms for PFIFO to freeze */
> + if (!nouveau_wait_eq(dev, 10000000, NV50_PFIFO_FREEZE,
> + 0x10, 0x10)) {
> + NV_ERROR(dev, "PFIFO freeze fail!\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +nv50_fifo_unpause(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + nv_wr32(dev, NV50_PFIFO_FREEZE, 0);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c
> index 2d7ea75..79bc157 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c
> @@ -1047,3 +1047,69 @@ nv50_graph_isr(struct drm_device *dev)
> if (nv_rd32(dev, 0x400824) & (1 << 31))
> nv_wr32(dev, 0x400824, nv_rd32(dev, 0x400824) & ~(1 << 31));
> }
> +
> +int
> +nv50_graph_pause(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + uint64_t start;
> + /* initial guess... */
> + uint32_t mask380 = 0xffffffff;
> + uint32_t mask384 = 0xffffffff;
> + uint32_t mask388 = 0xffffffff;
> + uint32_t mask504 = 0x00000001;
> + uint32_t mask700 = 0x00000001;
> +
> + start = nv04_timer_read(dev);
> +
> + /* Wait for the end of the execution of a ctxprog */
> + while ((!(nv_rd32(dev, 0x400504) & mask504)) ||
> + (nv_rd32(dev, NV50_PGRAPH_STATUS) & 0x100)) {
> + if (nv04_timer_read(dev) - start >= 10000000) {
> + if (nv_rd32(dev, NV50_PGRAPH_STATUS) & 0x100)
> + NV_ERROR(dev,
> + "PGRAPH: PGRAPH paused while running a ctxprog,"
> + " NV40_PGRAPH_CTXCTL_0310 = 0x%x\n",
> + nv_rd32(dev, NV40_PGRAPH_CTXCTL_0310));
This (and the error messages below) goes over the 80-column limit, and
the indentation is a bit weird.
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Stop PGRAPH */
> + nv_mask(dev, NV50_PGRAPH_CONTROL, 0x1, 0);
> +
> + /* Wait for PGRAPH to be really stopped */
> + while ((nv_rd32(dev, 0x400380) & mask380) ||
> + (nv_rd32(dev, 0x400384) & mask384) ||
> + (nv_rd32(dev, 0x400388) & mask388) ||
> + (!(nv_rd32(dev, 0x400504) & mask504)) ||
> + (nv_rd32(dev, NV50_PGRAPH_STATUS) & mask700)) {
> + if (nv04_timer_read(dev) - start >= 10000000) {
> + /* if you see this message,
> + * mask* above probably need to be adjusted
> + * to not contain the bits you see failing */
> + NV_ERROR(dev,
> + "PGRAPH: wait for idle fail: %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x!\n",
> + nv_rd32(dev, 0x400380),
> + nv_rd32(dev, 0x400384),
> + nv_rd32(dev, 0x400388),
> + nv_rd32(dev, 0x400504),
> + nv_rd32(dev, NV50_PGRAPH_STATUS));
> +
> + if (nv_rd32(dev, NV50_PGRAPH_STATUS) & 0x100)
> + NV_ERROR(dev,
> + "PGRAPH: PGRAPH paused while running a ctxprog,"
> + " NV40_PGRAPH_CTXCTL_0310 = 0x%x\n",
> + nv_rd32(dev, NV40_PGRAPH_CTXCTL_0310));
> +
> + nv50_graph_unpause(dev);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
I'm OK with this function but I have a feeling it could be simplified a
lot if you implemented it in terms of "nv_wait(_ne)()" (e.g. all the
loops, maskXXX and timer handling could go away).
> +
> +void
> +nv50_graph_unpause(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + nv_mask(dev, NV50_PGRAPH_CONTROL, 0, 0x1);
> +}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20110112/5eb55f8f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Nouveau
mailing list