[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: properly handle pushbuffer check failures
Marcin Slusarz
marcin.slusarz at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 03:31:35 PST 2011
When "buffer in list" check does not pass, don't free validation lists - they were
not initialized yet.
Fixes this oops:
[drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: push 105 buffer not in list
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000057c
IP: [<ffffffff81236aa4>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x14/0x13c
PGD 1ac6cb067 PUD 1aaa52067 PMD 0
CPU 0
Modules linked in: nouveau ttm drm_kms_helper snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec
Pid: 6265, comm: OilRush_x86 Not tainted 2.6.38-rc6-nv+ #632 System manufacturer System Product Name/P6T SE
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81236aa4>] [<ffffffff81236aa4>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x14/0x13c
(...)
Process OilRush_x86 (pid: 6265, threadinfo ffff8801a6aee000, task ffff8801a26c0000)
0000000000000000 ffff8801ac74c618 0000000000000000 0000000000000578
0000000000000000 ffff8801ac74c618 0000000000000000 ffff8801bd9d0000
[<ffffffff81417f78>] _raw_spin_lock+0x1e/0x22
[<ffffffffa00a2746>] nouveau_bo_fence+0x2e/0x60 [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa00a540b>] validate_fini_list+0x35/0xeb [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa00a54d3>] validate_fini+0x12/0x31 [nouveau]
[<ffffffffa00a6386>] nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf+0xe94/0xf6b [nouveau]
[<ffffffff8141ac56>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9e/0xb2
[<ffffffff81417e94>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x30/0x4d
[<ffffffff8105dea2>] ? __wake_up+0x3f/0x48
[<ffffffff812aebb4>] drm_ioctl+0x289/0x361
[<ffffffff8141ac56>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9e/0xb2
[<ffffffffa00a54f2>] ? nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf+0x0/0xf6b [nouveau]
[<ffffffff8141ac56>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9e/0xb2
[<ffffffffa010caa2>] nouveau_compat_ioctl+0x16/0x1c [nouveau]
[<ffffffff81142c0d>] compat_sys_ioctl+0x1c8/0x12d7
[<ffffffff814179ca>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x3a/0x6c
[<ffffffff81058099>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x30
[<ffffffff8141798e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3c
RIP [<ffffffff81236aa4>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x14/0x13c
RSP <ffff8801a6aefb88>
---[ end trace 0014d5d93e6147e1 ]---
Additionally, don't call validate_fini twice in case of validation failure.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index 3ce58d2..e8b04f4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
if (push[i].bo_index >= req->nr_buffers) {
NV_ERROR(dev, "push %d buffer not in list\n", i);
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
+ goto out_prevalid;
}
bo[push[i].bo_index].read_domains |= (1 << 31);
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
if (ret) {
if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS)
NV_ERROR(dev, "validate: %d\n", ret);
- goto out;
+ goto out_prevalid;
}
/* Apply any relocations that are required */
@@ -705,6 +705,8 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
out:
validate_fini(&op, fence);
nouveau_fence_unref(&fence);
+
+out_prevalid:
kfree(bo);
kfree(push);
--
1.7.4.rc3
More information about the Nouveau
mailing list