[Nouveau] [PATCH 6/6] drm/nouveau: use MSI interrupts
Ilia Mirkin
imirkin at alum.mit.edu
Wed Aug 28 22:00:52 PDT 2013
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Lucas Stach <dev at lynxeye.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2013, 17:09 +1000 schrieb Ben Skeggs:
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Lucas Stach <dev at lynxeye.de> wrote:
>>>>>> > MSIs were only problematic on some old, broken chipsets. But now that we
>>>>>> > already see systems where PCI legacy interrupts are somewhat flaky, it's
>>>>>> > really time to move to MSIs.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev at lynxeye.de>
>>>>>> > ---
>>>>>> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h | 1 +
>>>>>> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h
>>>>>> > index 9d2cd20..ce6569f 100644
>>>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h
>>>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h
>>>>>> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct nouveau_mc_intr {
>>>>>> > struct nouveau_mc {
>>>>>> > struct nouveau_subdev base;
>>>>>> > const struct nouveau_mc_intr *intr_map;
>>>>>> > + bool use_msi;
>>>>>> > };
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > static inline struct nouveau_mc *
>>>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
>>>>>> > index ec9cd6f..02b337e 100644
>>>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
>>>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
>>>>>> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>>>>> > */
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > #include <subdev/mc.h>
>>>>>> > +#include <core/option.h>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > static irqreturn_t
>>>>>> > nouveau_mc_intr(int irq, void *arg)
>>>>>> > @@ -43,6 +44,9 @@ nouveau_mc_intr(int irq, void *arg)
>>>>>> > map++;
>>>>>> > }
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > + if (pmc->use_msi)
>>>>>> > + nv_wr08(pmc->base.base.parent, 0x00088068, 0xff);
>>>>>> Register not present everywhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the very least, the enabling of MSI should be disallowed on the
>>>>>> earlier chipsets where it's not supported. Though, it's perhaps
>>>>>> possible that the pci_enable_msi() call will fail in all of these
>>>>>> cases anyway.. I'm not certain.
>>>>>>
>>>>> MSIs are required property for everything doing PCIe. So the only cases
>>>>> where this should fail is plain PCI/AGP devices. I don't really have a
>>>>> test system for those old cards set up.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I remember Ilia having some legacy things plugged in, so maybe he
>>>>> could test this patch and see how it goes?
>>>>
>>>> Sure, let me know what you need -- I have nv18 PCI, nv34 PCIe (note
>>>> that it's not native PCIe, but some sort of bridge thing IIRC),
>>> Cases like the nv34 here (i think there's some nv4x that aren't native
>>> pcie too) are what I'm wondering about primarily.
>>
>> And rightly so. With the NV18 PCI, NV34 PCIe, NV42 PCIe plugged in,
>> with "AutoAddGPU" disabled the NV18 and NV42 seem fine. However merely
>> starting X (not xinit, not startx, not [gkx]dm) on the NV34 and ^C'ing
>> it (with no clients connecting to said X), causes a "failed to idle
>> channel" message in dmesg, which apparently never rectifies itself, so
>> X is hung forever. FTR, there were no displays connected either, but I
>> tried the exact same procedure without the MSI patch and it worked
>> fine. Here is the init sequence with the MSI patch:
> I don't suppose bashing 0x1868 instead of 0x88068 works here? If not,
Should that work on the NV42 as well?
> next thing would be to mmiotrace the binary driver and see if you can
> make it enable+use MSI on it. I doubt the current legacy driver does
> it by default, but there was some magic to enable it that you can
> probably find if you google around.
I've yet to set up the legacy driver... I bet it doesn't compile on
3.11, so I'll have to patch it to nuke procfs/i2c...
>
>>
>> [ 307.049812] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:04:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x034a00b1
>> [ 307.049815] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:04:00.0] Chipset: NV34 (NV34)
>> [ 307.049819] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:04:00.0] Family : NV30
>> [ 307.050648] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] checking PRAMIN for image...
>> [ 307.050652] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... signature not found
>> [ 307.050653] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] checking PROM for image...
>> [ 307.195201] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... appears to be valid
>> [ 307.195205] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] using image from PROM
>> [ 307.195209] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] BMP version 5.29
>> [ 307.195429] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] version 04.34.20.79.00
>> [ 307.195971] nouveau [ DEVINIT][0000:04:00.0] adaptor not initialised
>> [ 307.195979] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] running init tables
>> [ 307.209253] nouveau 0000:04:00.0: irq 47 for MSI/MSI-X
>> [ 307.209266] nouveau [ PMC][0000:04:00.0] MSI interrupts enabled
>> [ 307.209281] nouveau W[ PTIMER][0000:04:00.0] unknown input clock freq
>> [ 307.209288] nouveau [ PFB][0000:04:00.0] RAM type: DDR1
>> [ 307.209290] nouveau [ PFB][0000:04:00.0] RAM size: 64 MiB
>> [ 307.209292] nouveau [ PFB][0000:04:00.0] ZCOMP: 0 tags
>> [ 307.215653] nouveau [ DRM] VRAM: 63 MiB
>> [ 307.215656] nouveau [ DRM] GART: 128 MiB
>> [ 307.215659] nouveau [ DRM] BMP version 5.41
>> [ 307.215662] nouveau [ DRM] DCB version 2.2
>> [ 307.215666] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 00: 01000300 000088b8
>> [ 307.215669] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 01: 02010310 000088b8
>> [ 307.215672] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 02: 01000302 00000000
>> [ 307.215676] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 03: 04010312 00000000
>> [ 307.215686] nouveau [ DRM] Adaptor not initialised, running
>> VBIOS init tables.
>> [ 307.215964] nouveau [ DRM] Saving VGA fonts
>> [ 307.310084] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010).
>> [ 307.310087] [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query.
>> [ 307.310093] nouveau [ DRM] 0xB61E: Parsing digital output script table
>> [ 307.360111] nouveau [ DRM] 0xB70B: Parsing digital output script table
>> [ 307.410799] nouveau [ DRM] 0 available performance level(s)
>> [ 307.410804] nouveau [ DRM] c: core 249MHz memory 405MHz
>> [ 307.412062] nouveau [ DRM] MM: using M2MF for buffer copies
>> [ 307.442478] nouveau 0000:04:00.0: No connectors reported connected with modes
>> [ 307.442483] [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes - going 1024x768
>> [ 307.442669] nouveau [ DRM] allocated 1024x768 fb: 0x9000, bo
>> ffff8801c73c3800
>> [...]
>> [ 360.414044] nouveau E[ X[8294]] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0001 [X[8294]]
>> [ 375.403288] nouveau E[ X[8294]] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0001 [X[8294]]
>> [ 390.392407] nouveau E[ X[8294]] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0001 [X[8294]]
>>
>> In case it's of interest, this is a Quadro NVS 280 card, here is the
>> lspci output:
>>
>> 04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation NV37GL
>> [Quadro PCI-E Series] [10de:00fd] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA
>> controller])
>> Subsystem: NVIDIA Corporation Device [10de:0215]
>> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
>> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
>> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
>> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 47
>> Region 0: Memory at f4000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
>> Region 1: Memory at c0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
>> Region 2: Memory at f5000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
>> [virtual] Expansion ROM at f6000000 [disabled] [size=128K]
>> Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2
>> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
>> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
>> Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>> Capabilities: [68] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
>> Address: 00000000feeff00c Data: 4162
>> Capabilities: [78] Express (v1) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
>> DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
>> <512ns, L1 <4us
>> ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-
>> DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal-
>> Unsupported-
>> RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
>> MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
>> DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq-
>> AuxPwr- TransPend-
>> LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s,
>> Latency L0 <2us, L1 <16us
>> ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
>> LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 128 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk-
>> ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
>> LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train-
>> SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
>> Capabilities: [100 v1] Virtual Channel
>> Caps: LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
>> Arb: Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
>> Ctrl: ArbSelect=Fixed
>> Status: InProgress-
>> VC0: Caps: PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
>> Arb: Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
>> Ctrl: Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=ff
>> Status: NegoPending- InProgress-
>> Capabilities: [128 v1] Power Budgeting <?>
>> Kernel driver in use: nouveau
>> Kernel modules: nouveau
>>
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions about my setup.
>>
>> -ilia
More information about the Nouveau
mailing list