[Nouveau] [PATCH] nv50, nvc0: don't base decisions on available pushbuf space

[Ilia Mirkin]

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/10/2015 09:58 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
>> <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2015 09:42 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
>>>> <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch looks fine except that it should be a bit more normalized. I
>>>>> mean, sometimes you break when PUSH_SPACE fails, sometimes not. Same
>>>>> for
>>>>> PUSH_SPACE calls, sometimes you add it sometimes not.
>>>>
>>>> Meh. We need to get our error checking situation straight, but this
>>>> isn't the patch to do it in.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, but this needs to be clarified.
>>
>> What does?
>
>
> I mean, we should either use PUSH_SPACE everywhere or not at all, and always
> breaks (or not) when PUSH_SPACE fails.
> That's really a minor issue.

It's actually a major issue. Error-handling is practically
non-existent. There are a couple of spots here and there, but it
doesn't really scale up. I guess I (semi-)accidentally removed a
couple of spots that error checked, but, again, meh. Doing this for
real will require some careful thought.

  -ilia