[Nouveau] [Bug 92438] Segfault in pushbuf_kref when running the android emulator (qemu) on nv50

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Sat Oct 31 08:37:19 PDT 2015


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92438

--- Comment #21 from Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean.com> ---
I have no idea what this code is supposed to be doing, but here's what I can
infer:

The call to pushbuf_kref crashes because the `struct nouveau_bo *bo` argument
is NULL, and cli_push_get tries to use it. The caller of pushbuf_kref,
pushbuf_validate, is iterating over a list of brefs; the current bref's bo
field is NULL.

This bref was created by nouveau_bufctx_refn, which was passed a NULL `bo`
argument. Its caller is nvc0_add_resident, which was passed a `struct
nv04_resource *` whose `bo` field is NULL.

This nv04_resource was created by a call to nouveau_buffer_create in which
buffer->domain is never set to anything other than 0. Looking at
nouveau_buffer_allocate, it seems like a domain of zero is a legitimate value;
the last branch of the if-else chain asserts that this is the case. Since that
path doesn't set buf->bo, it seems it's legitimate for buf->bo to be NULL.

pushbuf_kref seems adamant that bo should be non-NULL; both cli_push_get and
cli_kref_get require it. At this point I'm lost: should nouveau_bufctx_refn
never be passed a NULL bo? Should such a bufref never make it onto the list
that pushbuf_validate sees? I'm not sure.

Here's the stack trace at the call to nouveau_bufctx_refn:

#0  nouveau_bufctx_refn (bctx=0x555555b3eea0, bin=bin at entry=1, bo=0x0,
flags=256) at bufctx.c:126
#1  0x00007ffff0c33154 in nvc0_add_resident (flags=256, res=0x555555bf4800,
bin=1, bufctx=<optimized out>) at nvc0/nvc0_winsys.h:29
#2  nvc0_validate_vertex_buffers_shared (nvc0=0x555555b3cf30) at
nvc0/nvc0_vbo.c:407
#3  nvc0_vertex_arrays_validate (nvc0=0x555555b3cf30) at nvc0/nvc0_vbo.c:504
#4  0x00007ffff0c28e8e in nvc0_state_validate (nvc0=nvc0 at entry=0x555555b3cf30,
mask=mask at entry=4294967295, words=words at entry=8) at
nvc0/nvc0_state_validate.c:651
#5  0x00007ffff0c33670 in nvc0_draw_vbo (pipe=0x555555b3cf30,
info=0x7fffffffb9f0) at nvc0/nvc0_vbo.c:893
#6  0x00007ffff08ec867 in st_draw_vbo (ctx=<optimized out>,
prims=0x7fffffffbab0, nr_prims=1, ib=0x0, index_bounds_valid=<optimized out>,
min_index=0, max_index=2, tfb_vertcount=0x0, indirect=0x0) at
state_tracker/st_draw.c:286
#7  0x00007ffff08be81c in vbo_draw_arrays (ctx=0x7ffff7f22010, mode=4, start=0,
count=3, numInstances=1, baseInstance=0) at vbo/vbo_exec_array.c:645
#8  0x00005555555b21b7 in tutorial_02::gl::Gl::DrawArrays (self=0x7ffff6868010,
mode=4, first=0, count=3) at
target/debug/build/glium-e8f4c0a69cec8d2d/out/gl_bindings.rs:11032
#9  0x00005555555acee9 in
tutorial_02::ops::draw::draw<glium::uniforms::uniforms::EmptyUniforms,&glium::vertex::buffer::VertexBuffer<tutorial_02::main::Vertex>>
(context=0x7ffff6868010, framebuffer=..., vertex_buffers=0x7fffffffdc08,
indices=..., program=0x7fffffffd6f8, uniforms=0x5555557fc297 <const16333>,
draw_parameters=0x7fffffffd370, dimensions=...) at src/ops/draw.rs:320
#10 0x00005555555aa751 in
tutorial_02::Frame.Surface::draw<&glium::vertex::buffer::VertexBuffer<tutorial_02::main::Vertex>,&glium::index::NoIndices,glium::uniforms::uniforms::EmptyUniforms>
(self=0x7fffffffd508, vertex_buffer=0x7fffffffdc08,
index_buffer=0x7fffffffd8d0, program=0x7fffffffd6f8, uniforms=0x5555557fc297
<const16333>, draw_parameters=0x7fffffffd370) at src/lib.rs:1083
#11 0x0000555555576f84 in tutorial_02::main () at examples/tutorial-02.rs:48
#12 0x00005555557ccf85 in
sys_common::unwind::try::try_fn::h13449604025847140769 ()
#13 0x00005555557ca969 in __rust_try ()
#14 0x00005555557ccc20 in rt::lang_start::h426b3aba4736785fsbx ()
#15 0x00005555555b31da in main ()
(gdb)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20151031/20821e17/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Nouveau mailing list