[Nouveau] [PATCH drm-misc-next v7 1/7] drm/gpuvm: convert WARN() to drm_WARN() variants

Danilo Krummrich dakr at redhat.com
Tue Oct 31 16:47:26 UTC 2023


On 10/31/23 11:08, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 22:16 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> Use drm_WARN() and drm_WARN_ON() variants to indicate drivers the
>> context the failing VM resides in.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c            | 32 ++++++++++++++----------
>> --
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c |  3 ++-
>>   include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h                |  7 ++++++
>>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
>> index 08c088319652..d7367a202fee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
>> @@ -614,12 +614,12 @@ static int __drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm
>> *gpuvm,
>>   static void __drm_gpuva_remove(struct drm_gpuva *va);
>>   
>>   static bool
>> -drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(u64 addr, u64 range)
>> +drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64
>> range)
>>   {
>>          u64 end;
>>   
>> -       return WARN(check_add_overflow(addr, range, &end),
>> -                   "GPUVA address limited to %zu bytes.\n",
>> sizeof(end));
>> +       return drm_WARN(gpuvm->drm, check_add_overflow(addr, range,
>> &end),
>> +                       "GPUVA address limited to %zu bytes.\n",
>> sizeof(end));
>>   }
>>   
>>   static bool
>> @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static bool
>>   drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
>>                        u64 addr, u64 range)
>>   {
>> -       return !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(addr, range) &&
>> +       return !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(gpuvm, addr, range) &&
>>                 drm_gpuvm_in_mm_range(gpuvm, addr, range) &&
>>                 !drm_gpuvm_in_kernel_node(gpuvm, addr, range);
> 
> 
>>   }
>> @@ -656,6 +656,7 @@ drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
>>    * drm_gpuvm_init() - initialize a &drm_gpuvm
>>    * @gpuvm: pointer to the &drm_gpuvm to initialize
>>    * @name: the name of the GPU VA space
>> + * @drm: the &drm_device this VM resides in
>>    * @start_offset: the start offset of the GPU VA space
>>    * @range: the size of the GPU VA space
>>    * @reserve_offset: the start of the kernel reserved GPU VA area
>> @@ -668,8 +669,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
>>    * &name is expected to be managed by the surrounding driver
>> structures.
>>    */
>>   void
>> -drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
>> -              const char *name,
>> +drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
>> +              struct drm_device *drm,
>>                 u64 start_offset, u64 range,
>>                 u64 reserve_offset, u64 reserve_range,
>>                 const struct drm_gpuvm_ops *ops)
>> @@ -677,20 +678,20 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
>>          gpuvm->rb.tree = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
>>          INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gpuvm->rb.list);
>>   
>> -       drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(start_offset, range);
>> -       gpuvm->mm_start = start_offset;
>> -       gpuvm->mm_range = range;
>> -
>>          gpuvm->name = name ? name : "unknown";
>>          gpuvm->ops = ops;
>> +       gpuvm->drm = drm;
>>   
>> -       memset(&gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node, 0, sizeof(struct
>> drm_gpuva));
>> +       drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(gpuvm, start_offset, range);
>> +       gpuvm->mm_start = start_offset;
>> +       gpuvm->mm_range = range;
>>   
>> +       memset(&gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node, 0, sizeof(struct
>> drm_gpuva));
>>          if (reserve_range) {
>>                  gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node.va.addr = reserve_offset;
>>                  gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node.va.range = reserve_range;
>>   
>> -               if (likely(!drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(reserve_offset,
>> +               if (likely(!drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(gpuvm,
>> reserve_offset,
>>                                                       reserve_range)))
>>                          __drm_gpuva_insert(gpuvm, &gpuvm-
>>> kernel_alloc_node);
>>          }
>> @@ -712,8 +713,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_destroy(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm)
>>          if (gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node.va.range)
>>                  __drm_gpuva_remove(&gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node);
>>   
>> -       WARN(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&gpuvm->rb.tree.rb_root),
>> -            "GPUVA tree is not empty, potentially leaking memory.");
>> +       drm_WARN(gpuvm->drm, !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&gpuvm->rb.tree.rb_root),
>> +                "GPUVA tree is not empty, potentially leaking
>> memory.\n");
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gpuvm_destroy);
>>   
>> @@ -795,7 +796,8 @@ drm_gpuva_remove(struct drm_gpuva *va)
>>          struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm = va->vm;
>>   
>>          if (unlikely(va == &gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node)) {
>> -               WARN(1, "Can't destroy kernel reserved node.\n");
>> +               drm_WARN(gpuvm->drm, 1,
>> +                        "Can't destroy kernel reserved node.\n");
>>                  return;
>>          }
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
>> index 5cf892c50f43..aaf5d28bd587 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
>> @@ -1808,6 +1808,7 @@ int
>>   nouveau_uvmm_init(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm, struct nouveau_cli
>> *cli,
>>                    u64 kernel_managed_addr, u64 kernel_managed_size)
>>   {
>> +       struct drm_device *drm = cli->drm->dev;
>>          int ret;
>>          u64 kernel_managed_end = kernel_managed_addr +
>> kernel_managed_size;
>>   
>> @@ -1836,7 +1837,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_init(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm,
>> struct nouveau_cli *cli,
>>          uvmm->kernel_managed_addr = kernel_managed_addr;
>>          uvmm->kernel_managed_size = kernel_managed_size;
>>   
>> -       drm_gpuvm_init(&uvmm->base, cli->name,
>> +       drm_gpuvm_init(&uvmm->base, cli->name, drm,
>>                         NOUVEAU_VA_SPACE_START,
>>                         NOUVEAU_VA_SPACE_END,
>>                         kernel_managed_addr, kernel_managed_size,
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
>> index bdfafc4a7705..687fd5893624 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_gpuvm.h
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/rbtree.h>
>>   #include <linux/types.h>
>>   
>> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_gem.h>
>>   
>>   struct drm_gpuvm;
>> @@ -201,6 +202,11 @@ struct drm_gpuvm {
>>           */
>>          const char *name;
>>   
>> +       /**
>> +        * @drm: the &drm_device this VM lives in
>> +        */
> 
> Could a one-liner do?
> /** <comment> */

There are a few more existing ones that could be a one-liner as well and
I like consistency. If you think it's preferrable to keep those ones in
one line, I'd probably do it for all in a follow-up patch.

> 
>> +       struct drm_device *drm;
>> +
>>          /**
>>           * @mm_start: start of the VA space
>>           */
>> @@ -241,6 +247,7 @@ struct drm_gpuvm {
>>   };
>>   
>>   void drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
>> +                   struct drm_device *drm,
>>                      u64 start_offset, u64 range,
>>                      u64 reserve_offset, u64 reserve_range,
>>                      const struct drm_gpuvm_ops *ops);
> 
> I figure Christian's commend can be addressed in a follow-up patch if
> neeed.

I already addressed his comment in a local branch, I can also just add the
patch to this series.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> 



More information about the Nouveau mailing list