[PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: Remove surplus if-branch

[Philipp Stanner]

nouveau_fence_done() contains an if-branch which checks for the
existence of either of two fence backend ops. Those two are the only
backend ops existing in Nouveau, however; and at least one backend ops
must be in use for the entire driver to be able to work. The if branch
is, therefore, surplus.

Remove the if-branch.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta at kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
index 33535987d8ed..db6f4494405c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
@@ -259,21 +259,19 @@ nouveau_fence_emit(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
 bool
 nouveau_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
 {
-	if (fence->base.ops == &nouveau_fence_ops_legacy ||
-	    fence->base.ops == &nouveau_fence_ops_uevent) {
-		struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx = nouveau_fctx(fence);
-		struct nouveau_channel *chan;
-		unsigned long flags;
+	struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx = nouveau_fctx(fence);
+	struct nouveau_channel *chan;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-		if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags))
-			return true;
+	if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags))
+		return true;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
+	chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
+	if (chan && nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
+		nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
-		chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
-		if (chan && nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
-			nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
-	}
 	return test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags);
 }
 
-- 
2.48.1