<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [REGRESSION] KMS having issues after kernel upgrade (4.5.1-1 to 4.6.4-1)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97620#c27">Comment # 27</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [REGRESSION] KMS having issues after kernel upgrade (4.5.1-1 to 4.6.4-1)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97620">bug 97620</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> <span class="fn">Ilia Mirkin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Looking at our VBIOS repo, we have a bunch (but not all) of GF104's that are
missing the 0x2240c write as well as one GK107. Every other (GF100+) GPU sets
0x2240c. I guess it's not as reliable as we'd hoped.
This is how I checked:
for i in nv[cdef]?/*/*.rom nv1??/*/*.rom; do echo $i; nvbios $i |& grep
0x02240c; done
And looked for files without a 'NV_REG R[0x02240c] &= 0xfffffffd |=
0x00000002' command.
Although that in itself shouldn't be a major issue - rerunning the VBIOS
shouldn't cause issues...
Looking at a mmiotrace that came with one of those GF104 VBIOSes that are
missing a 0x2240c write, it doesn't seem like the VBIOS gets executed there, or
at least not that script. It's late and I could have messed up though.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>