<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990#c95">Comment # 95</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GM204] GTX 970 + 4GB VRAM fails at secboot (v4.6+)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94990">bug 94990</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:skeggsb@gmail.com" title="Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Ben Skeggs</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Alexandre Courbot from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94990#c94">comment #94</a>)
<span class="quote">> Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=128093" name="attach_128093" title="Log with patch 128091">attachment 128093</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=128093&action=edit" title="Log with patch 128091">[details]</a></span>
> Log with patch 128091
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Patch did not do the trick for me (log attached). Confirmed that
> 0001-nvkm_gpuobj-size-is-smaller-then-nvkm_gpuobj-size-ca.patch still
> succeeded, so apparently the method is not perfectly correct. Rather
> strangely the printk'd value of 0x100ce0 is 0x00000000...</span >
Yeah, everyone, don't bother trying this. This register is written by the
secure boot ucode, so the problem remains unsolved.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>