<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [NV67] Incomplete implementation of OpenGL 2.1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99033#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [NV67] Incomplete implementation of OpenGL 2.1" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99033">bug 99033</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:13ilya@gmail.com" title="Ilya Indigo <13ilya@gmail.com>"> Ilya Indigo</a> <pre>> Looking at the OpenGL 2.1 specification, I haven’t been able to find any extension, that was promoted to a core feature in OpenGL <= 2.1, that is not implemented by Nouveau. If this card is able to support later expansion, which should be implemented to the later video card, which shows a list of nvidia, why not add them to this card? > could you tell us which extensions are actually needed? I am sure you can understand, that we can't simply implement all of the missing ones in a wink of an eye, so we have to prefer the important ones. I thought, if in Mesa for nouveau declared support for OpenGL 4.1 at least, the increasingly younger expansion should be implemented already, just depending on the graphics card will connect them to a different set? Or something I do not understand, and for each GPU you write from scratch every extension?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>