<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - drm/nouveau: drm_hwcomposer cannot get rotation property/does not work" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104441#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - drm/nouveau: drm_hwcomposer cannot get rotation property/does not work" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104441">bug 104441</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:issor.oruam@gmail.com" title="Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@gmail.com>"> Mauro Rossi</a> <pre>Hi Ilia, thanks for your responses. Also in my understanding, which is not professional but more of an hobbyist, the drm planes model considered in drm_hwcomposer may have considered rotation property as available in its first implementations/test cases. IMHO since having no rotation is equivalent to having 0 rotation only, I don't see the reason for drm_hwcomposer to throw the error in drmplane.cpp:123, unless being born as an hwcomposer HAL and having a strong requirement for it (or to "fake it"). Also I wanted to get your feedback, which is in line with KMS documentation, that rotation property can be optional. Thanks for your hint, drm_hwcomposer is now part of freedesktop.org <a href="https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm_hwcomposer">https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm_hwcomposer</a> but I could not find how to submit a bug for drm_hwcomposer in bugzilla. I think it should not be in 'DRI' section and it should not be in 'Mesa' Mauro</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>