<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Crash when creating a depth buffer on GeForce 320M"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108500#c11">Comment # 11</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Crash when creating a depth buffer on GeForce 320M"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108500">bug 108500</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> <span class="fn">Ilia Mirkin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Given the amount of time that this has gone on unfixed, I think we should just
make mcp89 point at mcp77_mmu_new instead of g84_mmu_new (in
nvkm/engine/device/base.c).
Literally the only difference between those two is the ability to use
compression. The quick test in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=108500#c9">comment #9</a> didn't yield positive results.
Let's not make things extra-broken for people -- even if compression is somehow
enableable on those chips, it's never worked on nouveau, I think.
Timo - are you up to sending a change to fix the above in the kernel? If not, I
can do it.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>