[Ocs] problem adding a content with a download

[Mateu Batle]

 On 10/04/2010 09:12 AM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> On 20.09.2010, at 13:15, Mateu Batle wrote:
>
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> On 09/19/2010 03:58 PM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>>> Hi Mateu,
>>>
>>> I´m not sure if I understand you correctly.
>>>
>>> You mean you want a way to see if the user voted already for a content and the the score of the last voting?

That's correct.

>> That's right, I mean the score of the last voting for that user.
>> For example if user A votes 80 and user B votes 100,
>> then A would get 80 and B would get 100 in this field.
>> That is only possible if the user is authenticated of course.
> that a good idea. WE don´t have a call for this yet. Do you think this is needed for the Garage client?

I guess it is not the indispensable, but currently it is used in the
rating widget.
If the user has rated an application, we would like to show his actual
rating, not the community rating.
As far as I know this is how it worked with Intel App Up.


cheers
  Mat

>
>> I have a question about voting, a user can only vote once for a content ?
>> Or she could vote multiple times, but just the last one is taken into
>> account ?
> yes.
>
>> cheers
>>  Mateu
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17.09.2010, at 19:02, Mateu Batle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Frank,
>>>>
>>>> On 09/17/2010 11:57 AM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mateu,
>>>>>
>>>>> the release is online now.
>>>>> I hope everything works.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for the delay.
>>>>>
>>>>> I´m working on redoing the content voting now. So we can get the number of votes for an application. I think you requested this feature.
>>>> Yes, this would be great.
>>>> Since you are doing this, also could it be possible to get the user rating,
>>>> I mean not the average rating, but the rate that the user gave to an
>>>> application.
>>>> We also discussed about it ...
>>>>
>>>> thanks !
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> Mateu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17.09.2010, at 17:25, Mateu Batle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Frank,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still don't see the downloadway tag in the following responses from
>>>>>> OCS server
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://test.opendesktop.org/v1/content/data?categories=1801
>>>>>> https://test.opendesktop.org/v1/content/data/132711
>>>>>> https://test.opendesktop.org/v1/content/download/132711/1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the first one, it does not even report anything about the downloads.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also the download count does not seem to raise when I do the following
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://test.opendesktop.org/v1/content/download/132711/1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best regards
>>>>>> Mateu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/16/2010 08:43 AM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>>>>>>> On 16.09.2010, at 15:14, Mateu Batle wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 09/16/2010 05:58 AM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
>>>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) How we can know if it is type 0, 1 or 2 ? There is no field in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> response specifying that AFAIK.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Check here for an example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://test.opendesktop.org/v1/content/data/129629
>>>>>>>>>>> I seams that I made a stupid error in the 1.x version of the spec. The tag for the distribution type is called "downloadtype" instead of "downloaddistributiontype" So this tag is already taken.
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have an idea how to name it? Something like "downloadmode" perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I saw that, it caused me some confusion.
>>>>>>>>>> Other suggestions for names, maybe downloadkind or downloadway ?
>>>>>>>>>> Up to you.
>>>>>>>>> O.K. It´s called downloadway now. :-)
>>>>>>>>> I updated the specification. Will be on the test with the next update tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>>>> I see, just to make sure, in get requests like content list / content
>>>>>>>> get / content download we use downloadway
>>>>>>>> and in post requests like content add / content edit we use downloadtypN
>>>>>>>> being N a number, is that right ?
>>>>>>> exactly :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks Frank !
>>>>>>> no problem. Thanks for the API review and the bugreports
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> FRank
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cheers
>>>>>>>> Mat
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Ocs mailing list
>>>>>>>> Ocs at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ocs
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Frank Karlitschek
>>>>>>> karlitschek at kde.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Mateu Batle
>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>> Collabora Ltd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Ocs mailing list
>>>>>> Ocs at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ocs
>>>>> --
>>>>> Frank Karlitschek
>>>>> karlitschek at kde.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ocs mailing list
>>>>> Ocs at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ocs
>>>> -- 
>>>> Mateu Batle
>>>> Software Engineer
>>>> Collabora Ltd.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ocs mailing list
>>>> Ocs at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ocs
>>> --
>>> Frank Karlitschek
>>> karlitschek at kde.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ocs mailing list
>>> Ocs at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ocs
>>
>> -- 
>> Mateu Batle
>> Software Engineer
>> Collabora Ltd.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ocs mailing list
>> Ocs at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ocs
>
> --
> Frank Karlitschek
> karlitschek at kde.org
>
>
>
>


-- 
Mateu Batle
Software Engineer
Collabora Ltd.