[Ocs] Proposal: OCS 1.7 release

[梁辰晔]

Do/should we have a committee with more than one people  who has the
authority to release
 new spec?  I think it is important for us.

David.


2012/10/28 Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org>

> Hi Frank,
>
> Are there any blockers (feature, time, consideration and so forth) why
> this proposal got stuck and did not get any decision: neither
> approval, nor denial? I have just come across this service plan while
> chatting today about an addition to attica on irc:
>
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/open-collaboration-services-1.7#CLOUD
>
> Is it a blocker for 1.7 or why cannot we proceed with releasing the
> unreleased work we have? Thank you in advance.
>
> Laszlo
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Laszlo Papp <lpapp at kde.org> wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> >> Just reviewed the JSON draft, very clear.
> >> The differences between xml and json:
> >>    1. move the xml prop to json item.
> >>         example: <person details="summary"></person> --> { details:
> >> "summary"}
> >
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >>
> >>    2. remove the 'meta' node in xml
> >
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >>
> >> I'm going to modify my nodejs-ocs implementation following this.
> >>
> >>
> >> One question, about both the xml and json draft:
> >>    icon/video in 'content' is an array,
> >>
> >>    but preview/homepages in 'content' is list one by one by adding
> >> appendix(1, 2..10)
> >
> >
> > Correct. Unfortunately, there is this foobarX inside OCS v1 around. We
> have
> > been planning to address that issue in OCS v2.
> >
> > Thank you for your feedback.
> >
> > Laszlo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/ocs/attachments/20121030/596574f0/attachment.html>