[ohm] monitoring INPUT state

Nils Faerber nils.faerber at kernelconcepts.de
Fri Jun 29 08:20:14 PDT 2007


Ross Burton schrieb:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 17:05 +0200, Nils Faerber wrote:
>> Just for the sake of having this mentioned...
>> For OLPC the X servefr aproach seems valid and appropriate but other
>> devices might not run X11 but want to use OHM.
>> So the idle detection module of OHM should be able to have several,
>> probably configurable, source of idle information so that X11 would
>> become one optional source. Watching /dev/input/event* could then be
>> another method.
> Of course, all of OHM is pluggable.

Question that comes to my mind here is would we end up with two idle
modules or one generic idle module with additional "idle source" plugins?
I would actually prefer the first in order not to duplicate code.

> Ross
Cheers
  nils faerber

-- 
kernel concepts GbR      Tel: +49-271-771091-12
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48  Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57072 Siegen           Mob: +49-176-21024535
--


More information about the Ohm-devel mailing list