[ooo-build] arm failure to start OOo - terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::ucb::InteractiveAugmentedIOException'

[Chris Cheney]

Should that patch replace typesconfig-enforce.alignment.diff ?

Chris

On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 21:05 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 11:21 -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > Anyone have or have seen this issue before? This is running on the armel
> > architecture on Ubuntu.
> 
> I haven't seen it, but I've only ever built OOo on debian under qemu
> so...
> 
> Have you got workspace.cmcfixes59.patch applied ? That's got some fixes
> for IA64 and ARM to ensure the desired alignment, i.e. without it an ARM
> OOo built on qemu or in kernel lenient mode will auto-detect laxer
> alignment that is desirable on arm. There would probably be a kernel
> message about bad alignment in this case.
> 
> There was some spurious -march in unxlngr.mk in the past, but I think
> this is gone now.
> 
> It does look like it might be the very first uno exception throw getting
> busted (experiment with gdb, break main, catch throw, cont, and see if
> its "death on first excecption" which might point to experimenting with
> commenting out the #define USE_DOUBLE_MMAP in
> bridges/inc/bridges/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.hxx
> and seeing if that makes a difference.
> 
> Otherwise it might be the the exception code in
> bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/except.cxx is wrong, e.g. the bit
> inside __ARM_EABI__ but I've no real idea, just some possible clues. 
> 
> C.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ooo-build mailing list
> ooo-build at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/ooo-build