<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - driver does not detect VGA monitor, but there is one" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94277#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - driver does not detect VGA monitor, but there is one" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94277">bug 94277</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:kevinbrace@gmx.com" title="Kevin Brace <kevinbrace@gmx.com>"> Kevin Brace</a> <pre>(In reply to Benno Schulenberg from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94277#c8">comment #8</a>) > Hi Benno, > I wouldn't remove any detecttion code -- it's always nice to actually detect > something, if possible, and to see in the log that it /was/ detected. But > indeed, when in the end nothing at all can be detected, simply enabling the > VGA output as a fallback seems like a sensible idea. Especially since there > apparently exist faulty I2C busses and degraded monitors. (That is: /if/ > this cannot damage the chip in any way when in fact there is nothing at all > VGA-like connected to the chip's pins.) > > One other little I'd change is this line: > > > > [ 22.858] (II) CHROME(0): EDID for output VGA-1 > > Don't print that line unless actually an EDID was found, or at least change > the wording to something like: "Looking for an EDID for output VGA-1...". > I could be wrong on this, but my view is that the above message is generated by X Server, and not by OpenChrome itself.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>