<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Unknown Card-Ids (3371|1019|2125), Chipset: P4M900/VN896/CN896" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94130#c14">Comment # 14</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Unknown Card-Ids (3371|1019|2125), Chipset: P4M900/VN896/CN896" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94130">bug 94130</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:kevinbrace@gmx.com" title="Kevin Brace <kevinbrace@gmx.com>"> Kevin Brace</a> <pre>Hi everyone, I can go with the idea of releasing OpenChrome Version 0.3.4, but I will say that I will need to reverse last several commits I have made. This is what it will mean. - The large known device table will stay (only for Version 0.3.4) - VBE mode setting will stay (only for Version 0.3.4) - "Legacy" mode setting will stay (only for Version 0.3.4) - Benno's patch (<a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - fix compilation after recent rename" href="show_bug.cgi?id=94660">Bug 94660</a>) will get incorporated - Drop support for VT1632A external TMDS transmitter for now (it does not work) If this sounds okay, I can release OpenChrome Version 0.3.4 within two weeks. Of course, this assumes that I do not run into Git related tool usage issue. After that, I will return to "regularly scheduled program already in progress," and remove the following items from the master branch source code. - The large known device table - VBE mode setting option - "Legacy" mode setting option That version will be called OpenChrome Version 0.4.0, and all future development work will revolve around this version. I do not plan to make any more fixes to Version 0.3.4 branch code since it is broken in many ways. I hope to get VT1632A support back for something like Version 0.4.1 or 0.4.2. I will also like to support Silicon Image SiI 164 for that future version. Regarding VT1632A support, all I will do for now is OpenChrome will not initialize it. The code will stay, but via_dvi_init will not be called, making it effectively inactive. Let me know how all of you think.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>