<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - DRM / KMS bootup error on VX900 platform"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94473#c58">Comment # 58</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - DRM / KMS bootup error on VX900 platform"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94473">bug 94473</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:huangran@iscas.ac.cn" title="HuangRan <huangran@iscas.ac.cn>"> <span class="fn">HuangRan</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Hi Kevin,
Actually I didn't recommend you do the back porting work for VIA KMS driver
because of this reason...
I remember one team is doing that when I am in AMD and this team spend
several months to finish the back porting and verify it is working fine...
So for conclusion, I still suggest you use latest Linux distribution OS with
new kernel version.
Thanks,
Frank
(In reply to Kevin Brace from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94473#c57">comment #57</a>)
<span class="quote">>
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> I tried compiling James Simmons' developmental DRM module that supports KMS
> with Linux 3.2 kernel.
> It was a pretty miserable several hours I spent trying this . . .
> It appears that James used the latest TTM API, so it cannot practically be
> compiled with Linux kernel anything older than 3.18 without some rewriting.
> Considering that VIA Technologies hardware we are dealing here is not state
> of the art unlike stuff from NVIDIA, AMD, or Intel (in no particular order),
> I will be philosophically against using the latest API.
> If the older API is adequate, I will be inclined to sticking to it, unless
> there are technical reasons to using the newer API for newer generation
> hardware or older the API was obsoleted.
> Anyway, just to make it somewhat easier to compile it against older Linux
> kernels, the newer DRM module should supply its own PCI device IDs, rather
> than using the ones from DRM header file or Linux PCI device ID header file.
> Due to this compilation issue, I probably will have to use a shorter
> support period Lubuntu for the newer DRM development like Lubuntu 15.10 for
> experimenting with my ZOTAC ZBOX nano VD01.</span ></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>