<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - New build warnings"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96399#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - New build warnings"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96399">bug 96399</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:xavier@bachelot.org" title="Xavier Bachelot <xavier@bachelot.org>"> <span class="fn">Xavier Bachelot</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Hi Kevin,
(In reply to Kevin Brace from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=96399#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Xavier Bachelot from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=96399#c0">comment #0</a>)
>
> Hi Xavier,
>
> > Several build warnings have appeared in the previous months. Here are the
> > relevant extracts of a build log. This is a plain build of the master branch
> > on a fully updated Fedora 23.
> >
> > via_outputs.c: In function ‘viaProbePinStrapping’:
> > via_outputs.c:1202:17: warning: switch condition has boolean value
> > [-Wswitch-bool]
> > switch (sr13 && 0xC0) {
> > ^
> >
>
> I hope the patch I uploaded fixes the compilation warning.
> I hope it fixes the warning.
> </span >
Yes, the build warning (and bug) is gone.
<span class="quote">>
> > via_ums.c: In function ‘umsCreate’:
> > via_ums.c:711:11: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘xf86InitFBManager’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > ret = xf86InitFBManager(pScreen, &AvailFBArea);
> > ^
> > via_ums.c:722:9: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > ‘xf86InitFBManagerLinear’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > xf86InitFBManagerLinear(pScreen, offset, size);
> > ^
> >
> > I have seen more build warnings when building in a Fedora 23 chroot with the
> > Fedora enforced compile options, which enables more warnings than the plain
> > build. I'll report on them later, once I've taken a deeper look.
>
> That one I think comes from the code that is used to support XAA.
> When going through EXA code path, OpenChrome does not encounter the above
> API (or ABI or KPI).
> That being said, I do not know if it still has to be there for those
> compiling OpenChrome without the use of EXA or XAA (i.e., xBSD).</span >
I though XAA has been removed from the X server ?
I know precious little about the BSDs, so I can't comment.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>