<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [patch] allow disabling XvMC"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99475#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [patch] allow disabling XvMC"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99475">bug 99475</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:moikkis@gmail.com" title="Harri Nieminen <moikkis@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Harri Nieminen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Kevin Brace from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=99475#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Harri Nieminen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=99475#c2">comment #2</a>)
>
> XvMC code was written by previous developers 7 to 10 years ago.
> I had no involvement with it.
> Please understand that OpenChrome's project development resource is easily
> 1/30th of Intel graphics stack.
> I am the only developer working on the code, and my hands are completely
> tied up for the next few years.
> I am trying to fix various flaws of existing OpenChrome DDX code, and trying
> to fix the problems of OpenChrome DRM (KMS / TTM supporting version) so that
> it can be mainlined with the Linux kernel eventually.
> As a result, I have virtually no time to work on issues other than those two.
> I am leaning towards not incorporating this patch.
> I do not see the urgency of why this patch should be incorporated in the
> first place.
>
> >
> > XvMC is pretty useless today. It can only decode mpeg2.
> > Some users want to disable it.
> > Modern video players don't even support it.</span >
Okay thanks.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>