<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - blank screen on OpenChrome with VIA VE900" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106392#c27">Comment # 27</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - blank screen on OpenChrome with VIA VE900" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106392">bug 106392</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ptouchman@gmail.com" title="ptouchman@gmail.com">ptouchman@gmail.com</a> <pre>(In reply to Kevin Brace from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106392#c26">comment #26</a>) > I have not put in any effort into writing the rendering portion of the code > for the past 3 years since the initialization / mode setting / standby > resume portions of the code had too many issues that I needed to take care > of those portions first. > Besides that, so much of my time resources went into fixing OpenChrome DRM > as well. > I would imagine that writing OpenChrome DRM will likely take up almost all > of my development time resources for the rest of the year. > > > (In reply to ptouchman from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106392#c22">comment #22</a>) > > > > Since the knoppix 8.1 was working I thought I'd see what the performance of > > mame was and I only got 30fps on pacman (full speed would be 60fps). I'm glad that I got it to finally work! Maybe I'll have mame frameskip a little, I suppose it doesn't have to render every frame. 30 fps is actually playable. After reading your presentation I can see that it's a pretty monumental task to write video drivers. (A very interesting read, BTW) <a href="https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2017/brace_openchrome.pdf">https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2017/brace_openchrome.pdf</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>