[Openchrome-users] vt1625 and PAL modes?

[Ken Huisman]

On Sat, 2007-03-02 at 02:19 +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> timmy at invisibles.org wrote:
> > Quoting Xavier Bachelot <xb_ml at kelkoo.net>:
> > 
> >> timmy at invisibles.org wrote:
> >>> Quoting Xavier Bachelot <xb_ml at kelkoo.net>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Ken Huisman wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> OK, I also think it's time to commit this, so let's summarize.
> >>>>
> >>>> Your patch adds :
> >>>> - 720x480P : this is progressive ? What is this used for ?
> >>>> - 720x576Over PAL
> >>>> - 640x480 PAL
> >>>>
> >>>> It also modifies :
> >>>> - 720x480Under NTSC
> >>>> - 720x480Fit NTSC
> >>>> - 720x480Over NTSC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> These modes came from me originally - they're possibly badly named 
> >>> as  they're Progressive. I think Ken's version of them are Interlaced.
> >>>
> >> Ken's modes are NTSC modes while those in svn at the moment are 480P, 
> >> that's it ?
> >>
> >> X.
> > 
> > Yes, that's correct.
> > 
> > Tim
> Ok, here's an updated patch. It changes the progressive NTSC modes above 
> to 480P and adds all the modes in latest patch from Ken.
> 
> Ken, Tim, does it look correct ?
> 

Since the 480P resolution I added is the same as 720X480Under for
progressive scan, I'm not sure it is worth having both.  Is it valid to
name the progressive scan resolutions with the same name as the
interlaced ones?  How do you choose between them in the xorg.conf?  (I
wasn't sure about how this would be done so that is why I renamed it
720x480P so there would be no doubt).

Also, I attached a newer patch to the previous email that is worth
someone testing for the NTSC 720x480Over and 720x480Under resolutions.

cheers,

Ken


> Regards,
> Xavier