[Openchrome-users] card id (1019|AA2D) for VM800

[Xavier Bachelot]

Mark Huijgen wrote:
> Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> 
>> Mark Huijgen wrote:
>>
>>> Its a micro ATX VIA C7 motherboard with only a VGA connector, no DVI 
>>> or flatpanel connectors. Motherboard type is ITC-7AEEF
>>>
>>> II) VIA: driver for VIA chipsets: CLE266, KM400/KN400, K8M800,
>>>      PM800/PM880/CN400, VM800
>>> (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0
>>> (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
>>> (--) Chipset VM800 found
>>> (!!) VIA Technologies does not support or endorse this driver in any 
>>> way.
>>> (!!) For support, please refer to http://www.openchrome.org/ or
>>> (!!) your X vendor.
>>> (--) VIA(0): Chipset: "VM800"
>>> (EE) VIA(0): Unknown Card-Ids (1019|AA2D); please report to 
>>> openchrome-users at openchrome.org
>>>
>>> If more info is needed, I'll be happy to provide it.
>>>
>> The manufacturer for this motherboard is ECS, but what is the model ? 
>> I can't find anything neither on ECS website nor with the motherboard 
>> type  you gave.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Xavier
> 
> I ordered the device (thin client) from this site:
> http://www.picco.nl/product_info.php?products_id=2291&osCsid=b64e69dbf5c5617dde499f69a3dc00fe 
> 
> The documentation included with the shipment calls the thin client 
> "Model: LT-310", made in china :-s
> 
> Only the motherboard of my device is ITC-7AEEF and not (its 
> predecessor?) ITC-7AEEL.
> The latter one does have hits in google, i cant find my version.
> 
> 
> Motherboard looks a lot like this one, only differnt cooling (mine is 
> passive) and the ATX power connector is missing (only has the 12V type).
> http://www.zyang.net/mainboard/c7vcm.htm
> http://www.zyang.net//ecs/C7VCM.jpg
> Just found below the sticker ITC-7AEEF on the motherboard: C7VCM REV: 1.2
> 
Committed, thx.

> 
> The driver seems to function fine, 2D acceleration and XV work 
> correctly. Only thing not working so far is DRM/DRI. The via kernel 
> module doesnt
> seem to find the card (doesnt print anything in dmesg apart from "[drm] 
> Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102"), but maybe the module is to old.
> 
Yes, most probably. Use a recent kernel (I know at least 2.6.19.2 is 
fine) or build the modules from the git drm tree.

Regards,
Xavier