[OpenFontLibrary] OFL problems, IPA License annoyances

[Dave Crossland]

2009/4/7 Nicolas Spalinger <nicolas_spalinger at sil.org>:
>> Though addressing his point should not
>> require full rewrite of the license, just of the problem paragraph
>> (another bit should be clarifying the renaming clauses and make it
>> clear they're an option authors can shoose not to exercise).
>
> As indicated earlier, we feel this is sufficiently clarified in the OFL
> FAQ.

And as I said, I would prefer to avoid a new version of OFL until
there is a real world example of the OFLv1.1 being defective; until
then, the FAQ updates are the best response.