[OpenFontLibrary] OneClickOrgs beta - our environment is now ready
Ben Weiner
ben at readingtype.org.uk
Wed Dec 9 09:28:14 PST 2009
Hi,
On 8 Dec 2009, at 15:38, Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
>>
>> Do you mean "typeface designs and their software expressions"?
>
> I want to make it clear that that libre/open fonts are the software
> expressions of a typeface design. So no "and" but a parenthesis of
> explanation. Improved wording welcome. But that's what I strongly feel
> needs to be said.
>
> I want to make the software status of fonts clearer:
>
> typeface design = creative concept = idea
> fonts = software expression of the design = copyrightable work
>
> We will be accepting and publishing fonts not the "idea" of them, won't
> we? Let's make this terminology clear. Otherwise I feel we seriously
> risk abusing the trust of uploaders, who may easily be ripped off by
> those who believe (and there are an increasing number) that ideas
> shouldn't be bound by copyright law only their actual implementations.
> Especially as this varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. This isn't
> our goal, right?
Ah! OK.
Perhaps: "The software expression of typeface designs"
Thus limiting OFLB to:
- being a repository for files
- providing information about their creation and best use
On the right track?
Ben
Ben Weiner | http://readingtype.org.uk/about/contact.html
+44 (0) 7780 608 659
More information about the OpenFontLibrary
mailing list