[OpenFontLibrary] Contribute logos for permissive font licenses on OFLBv2

[Nicolas Spalinger]

Dave Crossland wrote:
> 2009/7/30 Robert Martinez <mail at mray.de>:
>> Apart from that only a MIT and a GPL version are required - right?
>> I can work on those icons this evening.
> 
> Those 3 licenses are our 'recommended' or 'core' ones, and I think
> that if we host other licensed fonts (again, I forget where we are on
> that) they could just have a 'generic free' license icon. So if you
> can work on 3 icons (that I might keyword as GPL, BSD, FREE) that
> would be great :-)

Why the mixup of license policy again? We really need to avoid confusing
contributors.

See the previous thread where this was discussed:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openfontlibrary/2009-July/002381.html

We really need to use official logos of our licenses. Get in touch with
the authors of MIT for that one. The GPLv3 + FE logo needs to be
different from standard http://www.gnu.org/graphics/license-logos.html
for clarity.

Seriously, what will "a generic free" keyword/icon blanket category
bring apart from confusion about what "free" means?



-- 
Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer
Debian/Ubuntu font teams / OpenFontLibrary
http://planet.open-fonts.org


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openfontlibrary/attachments/20090730/378dfd37/attachment.pgp