[OpenFontLibrary] Ubuntu Font Testing webapp
Khaled Hosny
khaledhosny at eglug.org
Tue Jul 13 13:51:11 PDT 2010
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 03:45:52PM -0500, Nathan Willis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com> wrote:
>
>
> If the font name users see in their font menu is "FontName
> Beta-20100713" how can they set and forget?
>
>
> I don't think they can; I was only saying that those three things (Apt repo,
> font name, .sfd-only) are orthogonal. Or complementary, rather. Wondering
> what everyone thought about the relative value of them. Do many people use a
> repo for an in-development font, for example?
When I mentioned the repository, I meant a version control repository
(usually git), Debian packaging is beyond mere mortals like me.
I'm strongly in favour of open development model, but I can understand
when font designers are over-protective.
Regards,
Khaled
--
Khaled Hosny
Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
Free font developer
More information about the OpenFontLibrary
mailing list